- Joined
- Nov 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,974
This is one stone out of 2 million and 300 thousand stones that were (supposedly) cut, dragged and lifted to build the Great Pyramid more than 5000 years ago. Something is seriously wrong with our history
I point this out all the time.This is one stone out of 2 million and 300 thousand stones that were (supposedly) cut, dragged and lifted to build the Great Pyramid more than 5000 years ago. Something is seriously wrong with our history
View attachment 118937
One of the ancient civilizations, maybe the Sumerians, build coffin-shaped rockets for their dead. They say it is so they can go back to the star their people are from.I point this out all the time.
It is 'rock-solid proof' that they had help from 'above' because it was impossible that it was done by humans at the time.
Did you know they found huge batteries in one of the pyramids that dates back to when the pyramids were built? One of the pyramids in central America, built when supposedly only people with an Asian lineage lived there, has a "God" buried in it that has blond hair and blue eyes?Aliens or a civilization that had superior science and technology but disappeared after some disaster?
I watched some video recently about how themagnetic poles change and that causes huge amounts of problems on this planet, climate change, earthquakes, volcanos , earth shifting , tsunamis . It is supposedly caused by the sun and solar storms
it was on youtube
That is the part I can only partially get right, I don't have the resources, but I can tell you that gravity is not a force, it is a vibration and can be jammed.OK they cold be moved horizontally that way but how did they get those giant stones up to where they are?
True, but cutting those huge stones was obviously done with a very powerful laser overhead. They are far too precise to be done 'by hand'.Moving and stacking those giant stones in the pyramids does not seem so impossible an engineering feat if the aliens were much bigger than us.
Imagine what a termite would think of a Lego castle we built. Amazing! Super advanced technology! Able to move extraordinarily heavy blocks! Unbelievable engineering how they fit together so exactly (they came that way from the factory). Unfathomable intelligence required to make something like that (Joe Biden could have built it. Well, a very simple castle anyway. With help.)
The pyramids seem extraordinary only because of their size relative to us. Jumbo sized aliens could have thrown those things together as toddlers.
I don't know. You could probably do a pretty good job with a jumbo alien sized Dremel tool. Or an alien nail file, with enough patience.... obviously done with a very powerful laser overhead. They are far too precise to be done 'by hand'.
Scientists need to open their minds when they see precision that could not have been done by humans.I don't know. You could probably do a pretty good job with a jumbo alien sized Dremel tool. Or an alien nail file, with enough patience.
I think it is Machu Picchu where the stones fit so tight, a piece of paper will not go in the cracks.Scientists need to open their minds when they see precision that could not have been done by humans.
There also.I think it is Machu Picchu where the stones fit so tight, a piece of paper will not go in the cracks.
You know the accepted theory of a meteor killing the dinosaurs? I read a paper by some paleontologists who don't believe it. They say if the sunlight was blocked, it would have only taken a couple years to kill them off. But they say the evidence proves that it took a few thousand.
I wonder if the fit was tight enough to exclude a sheet of paper when the rocks were stacked? Now, after a long time, things could have settled, the rocks may have actually sagged a little bit under their weight, water may have infiltrated and caused expansion (or frozen and broken off small sand-sized chips of rock that are what's actually excluding the paper). The rocks could have also had a rougher fit, but as they were placed that movement made them act like grinding wheels against each other, thus grinding each other flatter and filling in voids with finely sanded rock remnants. Plus, when you're looking at rocks stacked on each other that are too large and heavy for you to move, you are only looking at the "fit" around the periphery. The inner fit - that you can't see - might be much rougher.I think it is Machu Picchu where the stones fit so tight, a piece of paper will not go in the cracks.
Ok, I'll buy that.Just because you don't know the answer to something, doesn't mean that you can stick in any old therefore as the cause and claim it's true. That's not how logic works. But we sure see a lot of this type of thinking these days. To this group of thinkers, "we don't know how it was done" or "we don't know what caused this" is all the proof they need to "prove" that their therefore is correct. Sigh...
I'd like to examine that paper before attempting to support or rebut it. But there is incredible evidence, starting with the K-T layer of Iridium throughout the world, discovered and detailed by the Alvarezes (pere et fils). Their hypothesis, developed in 1980, is supplemented by a post-impact snapshot tsunami inflow and outflow scars, seiches, (and pebble deposition) throughout the post-impact path from Chicxulub to the far north.You know the accepted theory of a meteor killing the dinosaurs? I read a paper by some paleontologists who don't believe it. They say if the sunlight was blocked, it would have only taken a couple years to kill them off. But they say the evidence proves that it took a few thousand.
Enter your email address to join: