- Joined
- Dec 31, 2017
- Messages
- 3,847
Some of the writings are way off, and I hope that map wasn't intended to be accurate top of the OP link, we have no nuclear reactors in Washington or Idaho at this time, also the listed projected targets under First US Targets to be Nuked, totally inaccurate. One or two HEMPs 250-300 miles up over Nebraska is enough to take down the grid by cascading affect. Seems like the Author of the article watch too many youtube videos? Also, NK have not perfected nukes base satellites, they were just getting handle on nuke mounted ICBMs nor perfected OTH re-entry (yet)
Is there a current, accurate map online?
With an EMP, there is no nuclear fallout. No worries about rads & dying from radiation within 30 days. Instead 90% of the population will slowly starve or kill each other over food/supplies.
The only variety of "EMP-safe zones" is far, far from population locations.
No fallout with HEMP, problem is, a HEMP isn't going to be the only missiles in the air. Fallout will be a problem. First comes the HEMP followed by a series of Primary nuclear weapons. SILOS, SAC, C&C, COMS targets will follow a EMP/HEMP attack. Secondary attack will take out RR switching stations, nuclear power plants, dams and Airports with runways of 10,000ft Commercial/Military.
I might be wrong Maverick. Does Columbia generating station near Richland Wa have nuclear reactors. I’m northeast of that location in BC so just curious if it’s still active.
Enter your email address to join: