Found this on 'another forum', and found it relevant / fascinating enough to Discuss / expand into a bigger 'What can We learn from it' / apply to Today / Future:
..but I Also think this could be expanded into a discussion of the 'dangers' of "Well, I survived [x], therefore, I should be all-good for [x + y]..."
To me, one of the Biggest 'dangers' of Survivorship Bias would be complacency / allowing oneself to be seduced by 'Perfect is the enemy of Good Enough - Therefore, I shall Do Nothing Further-than That', etc.. ie:
Citizen Cane bought some nice Guns / Ammo, and took a legit Course on 'basic shooting skills', etc, and Does, indeed, "go to the range" a couple times a year, and, in fact, Is a 'pretty good shot'... From the Bench.. And (of course..) with no one 'shooting back', at him.
..One day, though, post some hotly-debated Local Trial's decision, the 'SJWs' come out to the 'Burbs, in force, and begin to toss molotovs at homes / stopping cars / beating random 'Evil white people', etc, and when Cane perceives immediate Threat to His home - he exits, Armed and Ready to protect his Family / Home (think the 'McCloskeys', etc)
..And is immediately fired upon - which fortunately, misses, but the assailant runs away laterally, and although Seeing / pointing his Gun at the attacker - Cane is shot when the punk takes cover behind a car, and is killed. Where did he 'go wrong'? Well - He never took the Time to Learn How to shoot a Moving Target.
(Note: this would not really be "Survivorship Bias", as-defined in the illustration, above, but it's an Example of what I mean by 'let's Expand the discussion' - Ergo: He felt "I Have guns / Can shoot / Can hit a target = I'm "Safe". Unfortunately he was Wrong. +_+
Also, this is Not an example of "Normalcy Bias".. In This scenario, Normalcy Bias would be more like 'I don't Need a Gun, because... "Police".. etc..)
How can we, as 'Survivalists / Homesteaders' apply / learn from both what the Illustration / That historical example, as well as the Above, might 'Teach' us? Thoughts?
jd
..but I Also think this could be expanded into a discussion of the 'dangers' of "Well, I survived [x], therefore, I should be all-good for [x + y]..."
To me, one of the Biggest 'dangers' of Survivorship Bias would be complacency / allowing oneself to be seduced by 'Perfect is the enemy of Good Enough - Therefore, I shall Do Nothing Further-than That', etc.. ie:
Citizen Cane bought some nice Guns / Ammo, and took a legit Course on 'basic shooting skills', etc, and Does, indeed, "go to the range" a couple times a year, and, in fact, Is a 'pretty good shot'... From the Bench.. And (of course..) with no one 'shooting back', at him.
..One day, though, post some hotly-debated Local Trial's decision, the 'SJWs' come out to the 'Burbs, in force, and begin to toss molotovs at homes / stopping cars / beating random 'Evil white people', etc, and when Cane perceives immediate Threat to His home - he exits, Armed and Ready to protect his Family / Home (think the 'McCloskeys', etc)
..And is immediately fired upon - which fortunately, misses, but the assailant runs away laterally, and although Seeing / pointing his Gun at the attacker - Cane is shot when the punk takes cover behind a car, and is killed. Where did he 'go wrong'? Well - He never took the Time to Learn How to shoot a Moving Target.
(Note: this would not really be "Survivorship Bias", as-defined in the illustration, above, but it's an Example of what I mean by 'let's Expand the discussion' - Ergo: He felt "I Have guns / Can shoot / Can hit a target = I'm "Safe". Unfortunately he was Wrong. +_+
Also, this is Not an example of "Normalcy Bias".. In This scenario, Normalcy Bias would be more like 'I don't Need a Gun, because... "Police".. etc..)
How can we, as 'Survivalists / Homesteaders' apply / learn from both what the Illustration / That historical example, as well as the Above, might 'Teach' us? Thoughts?
jd