You hear this term thrown around frequently, and IMHO it is grossly overused.
First let's look at the definition of immigrant: a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country. When the first colonists arrived here, would you call them immigrants? I would not. They were not moving to a foreign counry. There was no country. To them it was unexplored wilderness. Call them colonists. Call them explorers, whatever.
Even in the very early days of a new nation, the immigrant population was only in the 15% range. People who are born here are not immigrants. They are citizens. You can only find numbers back to about 1850, but I don't believe the immigrant population was ever much higher than 15% if was was higher at all. Even today the "legal" immigrant population is about 14%.
So my argument is that we are not a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of citizens. The immigrant population is a very minor portion of the total. What do you think?
First let's look at the definition of immigrant: a person who comes to live permanently in a foreign country. When the first colonists arrived here, would you call them immigrants? I would not. They were not moving to a foreign counry. There was no country. To them it was unexplored wilderness. Call them colonists. Call them explorers, whatever.
Even in the very early days of a new nation, the immigrant population was only in the 15% range. People who are born here are not immigrants. They are citizens. You can only find numbers back to about 1850, but I don't believe the immigrant population was ever much higher than 15% if was was higher at all. Even today the "legal" immigrant population is about 14%.
So my argument is that we are not a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of citizens. The immigrant population is a very minor portion of the total. What do you think?