As far as cannabis goes I don't care if one smokes it or not, I just don't want it around me or the property but as far as it being harmful, no worse than cigarettes and spirits. As long as the Feds keep it illegal I don't want it on the property, In the Feds eyes cannabis and firearms in the vicinity of one another isn't a good thing. I have too much invested in my life for the Feds to get an attitude with me.
I will say this, I've seen a whole lot of attitudes from folks that didn't get their nicotine fix Vs the ones that only smoked cannabis, that their tells me cigarettes have a far greater impact of bringing out Mr Hyde.
"Now the state of Colorado has offered up its answer. Under House Bill 1114, the answer is five nanograms. If a blood screen detects five or more nanograms of THC (that's delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis) per milliliter of blood in a person's bloodstream, that individual is considered legally under the influence of drugs. Washington has also set its intoxication limit at five nanograms per milliliter.
But the question is not that simple. What is marijuana impairment -- what constitutes being "too high" to drive -- and how can we scientifically evaluate it, particularly in a law enforcement context? Moreover, how can police officers test for it conclusively at the roadside, where blood tests aren't available? How lawmakers define and answer these questions will have a lot to do with marijuana policy in the U.S. going forward, and unfortunately the body of science describing marijuana's effects on the brain and body -- though vast -- isn't exactly bound by broad consensus. Five nanograms per milliliter is a place for policy to start, but it's by no means the last word determining how high is too high."
https://www.popsci.com/science/arti...tates-how-will-police-regulate-stoned-driving
I will say this, I've seen a whole lot of attitudes from folks that didn't get their nicotine fix Vs the ones that only smoked cannabis, that their tells me cigarettes have a far greater impact of bringing out Mr Hyde.
"Now the state of Colorado has offered up its answer. Under House Bill 1114, the answer is five nanograms. If a blood screen detects five or more nanograms of THC (that's delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis) per milliliter of blood in a person's bloodstream, that individual is considered legally under the influence of drugs. Washington has also set its intoxication limit at five nanograms per milliliter.
But the question is not that simple. What is marijuana impairment -- what constitutes being "too high" to drive -- and how can we scientifically evaluate it, particularly in a law enforcement context? Moreover, how can police officers test for it conclusively at the roadside, where blood tests aren't available? How lawmakers define and answer these questions will have a lot to do with marijuana policy in the U.S. going forward, and unfortunately the body of science describing marijuana's effects on the brain and body -- though vast -- isn't exactly bound by broad consensus. Five nanograms per milliliter is a place for policy to start, but it's by no means the last word determining how high is too high."
https://www.popsci.com/science/arti...tates-how-will-police-regulate-stoned-driving