Disasters sell, or in this case talk of disaster sells?Even the BBC is running with it.
TELEGRAPH
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-plan-tells-citizens-to-hoard-food-and-water/
REUTERS
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-security-stockpiling-idUSKCN10W0MJ
EURONEWS
http://www.euronews.com/2016/08/22/stockpile-food-and-water-in-case-of-attack-germans-set-to-be-told
UK BUSINESS INSIDER
http://uk.businessinsider.com/german-press-stockpile-food-and-water-in-case-of-attacks-2016-8
ZEROHEDGE
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...tockpile-food-water-first-time-cold-war-ended
ttp://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/22/germany-may-warn-public-to-stockpile-food-and-water-in-case-of-attack-report.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-security-stockpiling-idUSKCN10W0MJ
https://www.rt.com/news/356682-germany-defense-plan-food/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-37155060
WHY are so many respected media sources running with this article???
and why 10? why not more then that? like 30 days or more..
In several meetings here with the feds that point was brought up, why not recommend a 30 day emergency supply? several factors were listed, one of the reasons it would send the wrong message, the other reasons is that most people don't have the space nor the money to stock pile a 30 day supply for the family and that it would create an undue burden on the economically challenged families. I remember when we were pushing for the two weeks emergency supplies the feds and ARC were nervous going forward with the recommendation, it took years to get the two weeks I think we would be pushing our luck with a 30 day recommendation, ARC still not sold on the two weeks, if ARC were fully on board FEMA would follow suit or vice a versa.
Truthfully though, if everyone stockpiled 30 day supplies I think FEMA and ARC may feel they are less relevant and lose funding's/donations so in that respect I think it's self-preservation as the real reason why they don't extend the 3-day/14-day out to 30-day.
In several meetings here with the feds that point was brought up, why not recommend a 30 day emergency supply? several factors were listed, one of the reasons it would send the wrong message, the other reasons is that most people don't have the space nor the money to stock pile a 30 day supply for the family and that it would create an undue burden on the economically challenged families. I remember when we were pushing for the two weeks emergency supplies the feds and ARC were nervous going forward with the recommendation, it took years to get the two weeks I think we would be pushing our luck with a 30 day recommendation, ARC still not sold on the two weeks, if ARC were fully on board FEMA would follow suit or vice a versa.
Truthfully though, if everyone stockpiled 30 day supplies I think FEMA and ARC may feel they are less relevant and lose funding's/donations so in that respect I think it's self-preservation as the real reason why they don't extend the 3-day/14-day out to 30-day.
have been on a defence forum here talking about this,seems like some dudes there are following the principle ; food-check,water-check,ammo-check and the list goes on...this must be something more than just disasters sell type of thing,but I'm just too dumb to be able to connect all the dots...
I wouldn't trust FEMA as far as I could throw one of their over bloated bureaucrats. As far as the "economically challenged" being unable to stock up on supplies, they all seem to have money for beer, cigarettes, cell phones, internet and dope. Let them starve.
Enter your email address to join: