Grand Solar Minimum

Homesteading & Country Living Forum

Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Weedygarden

Awesome Friend
HCL Supporter
Neighbor
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
20,955
I saw this video, and want to do more follow up on the topic. All the hysteria about global warming is actually the opposite of what is happening. This is relative to the thread about crop failure. I could post there, but I believe this is a topic worth following up on. Have any of you heard of this?



 
I have been following a group on FB that goes into this. Not as much research on my own. But I've seen enough to believe it is true. Much more so than global warming is. I do know for sure that the sunspot count is very low and has been for over a year now. Ham radio on the HF bands use sunspots and track them closely for long distance comms. There has been a lot of discussions on ham sites about it recently.
It is well worth looking into deeper.
 
Been following it for a long time and believe it to be true.

It has kicked my hinnie into gear and I am taking gardening to a whole new level now.

I am going the market garden route with weed mat, reo / cattle panel trellises, drip irrigation on timers and mesh row covers.
Experimenting with dif. varieties of seed and I no longer care if it's a F1 hybrid so long as it produces and puts food in my pantry.
Once I get this garden sorted I'll be putting in a order for 12 egg producing ducklings. There aren't council laws about owning drakes
and ducks won't get over low fencing and their eggs have more nutritional value than chickens, lay in winter and summer when chickens have gone off the lay.
Their manure will add fertility to the soil.
They will be a source of fat which is hard to produce on a very small piece of land.
 
I knew of grand solar minimums in high school when they were teaching real science many decades ago and before the fake global warming became a thing.
 
The CO2 lobby is always complaining about how CO2 is so high but it is barely above the point where plants will not be able to grow. The best CO2 level for plants is 1000 parts per million and we are at 400??
I know that nurseries buy CO2 tanks to increase the CO2 levels in their green houses. During the carbonaceous period (when plants and insects ruled the world) the CO2 levels were just over the 1000 ppm and the oxygen levels were well above the 20% level.
 
Link to a mini book that is free to download
https://survivingthesgsm.com/index.html


Here is the link to his blog on the GSM
https://survivingthesupergrandsolarminimum.blogspot.com/2019/

He also has his entire blog in pdf form
https://survivingthesgsm.com/index.html

Also Christian of Iceage farmer has a blog post about growing degrees days plummeting. He has a way to check to see if your area has had a decline in growing days.
http://www.iceagefarmer.com

edit to add that you can just put in your state and get the info for every county


I checked my area we've only lost 1.4%



Just some info I thought ya all would like to read
 
Last edited:
I ordered this book a couple weeks ago. Had to go out of town and didn't start reading it.
book-long-dark-winter.jpg
 
This whole thread is just one big lie. Al Gore told me that I need to buy carbon offsets or Wyoming will be beach front property.

All kidding aside, this is actually pretty interesting stuff.
 
This whole thread is just one big lie. Al Gore told me that I need to buy carbon offsets or Wyoming will be beach front property.

All kidding aside, this is actually pretty interesting stuff.

Yes. No sunspots is a big thing but nobody will talk about it. The thing is if you tell people that the temps will be getting colder they think its going to happen like in the movie " The Day After" but its not. It will take time and it will get harder to grow certain crops in some places while other places will turn into grow areas that haven't been so for decades ( think China buying land in Africa).
Deserts are blooming again, volcanoes are going off all over the world more often which puts more ash into the air dimming the sunlight that reaches the earth. Rare storms hitting countries that don't have those types or so severe so their crops are devastated ( corn, wheat, olives, potatoes, fruits)
 
principia-scientific said:
"Global Cooling expected to last from 2020-2055
Published on October 4, 2019"
crinfo2_strip2.png

You do realize that this is going to leave a lot of "Global-Warming" people clinging to icicles, right?
When it comes to 500 scientists saying that the sun is going thru it's normal cycle and is about to 'dial it back' verses people trying to count cow farts, I think the sun will be a bigger factor:rolleyes:.
If course the carbon-emission watchers will be congratulating themselves on being successful. All those green-cars and windmills paid off!:woo hoo:
High-five.gif
 
Last edited:
Will those climate alarmists want us to go back to cars with monster motors to warm the earth back up? :rolleyes:
 
Some how I missed this thread in July... Very interesting!
Lot of interesting stuff on that website you won't ever see.
Even when the 'Global Warming' people are caught red-handed lying, they call it a "mistake":rolleyes:.
https://principia-scientific.org/wwf-apologizes-for-doctored-polar-bear-image-in-climate-campaign/
Of course this is after every MSM spreads the fake photo all over the world.
Doesn't this look just terrible:eek::
WWF_r.JPG


How about now? The real picture:
original-photo.jpg


Embarrassed WWF person said:
"...WWF Finland’s Anne Brax. She stressed that the photo was used for advertising and not for news purposes.
“Like all other organizations, we used a composite picture in the ad. Collages or composite pictures or otherwise manipulated photos are used in marketing to emphasize a message and for visual impact,” she commented.
...However, she admitted that the NGO made a mistake in assuming that the photo would be seen as an advertising image rather than an actual situation.
“We have made a mistake and we deeply regret it,” she said, adding that advertising photos should clearly indicate that they have been retouched.
See, that was an "advertising photo" so it's not a lieo_O.

@SheepDog , I'm willing to make the sacrifice:D. Next door neighbor has a Caddy with a 472 in it that needs a little love:).
 
Last edited:
We need more caring people in the world like us...;)
 
Polar bears swim great distances to find new hunting grounds. They will sometimes climb onto icebergs to rest. Whether this photo is fake or real the lie is that this is bad for the bears. The bears don't get caught with no option but to drift on a melting berg. Sometimes they walk from A to B and sometimes they swim.
 
Polar bears swim great distances to find new hunting grounds. They will sometimes climb onto icebergs to rest. Whether this photo is fake or real the lie is that this is bad for the bears. The bears don't get caught with no option but to drift on a melting berg. Sometimes they walk from A to B and sometimes they swim.
Those bears were never on that berg.
They were photoshopped onto it.
That's why the WWF made the apology when they got caught faking it.

The more important question is, how much other stuff has been faked and swallowed up by sheeple?
Thinking.gif
Some of it, or most of it?
You're not going to like the answer.
 
Those bears were never on that berg.
They were photoshopped onto it.
That's why the WWF made the apology when they got caught faking it.

The more important question is, how much other stuff has been faked and swallowed up by sheeple?View attachment 26589 Some of it, or most of it?
You're not going to like the answer.
I am going to like the answer, especially when the public learns that they have been lied to for decades. I never said those bears were on the berg.
 
Some of the young people I know have been sold a bill of goods that they have swallowed hook, line and sinker. They've been told that we have little time left. They have probably not been taught that the U.N. has a plan for de-population by 2030. While there are many things we can do to reduce our consumption, it doesn't have to be couched as "saving our planet," and ""We're all going to die if we keep eating beef." I know people who have been that affected and trained by this. No more beef for them, but they will eat pork, which has damaged the earth more than beef has.
 

Another North Dakota farming disaster video.:rolleyes:
Yes, early rains prevented them from planting soon enough.
Yes, an early blizzard buried the crops before they could be harvested. We get that.
Sure it sucks to be them right now.
But the USA is not North Dakota!
National grain production is just fine.
No need for us to go out and plant a garden just to survive.
 
Last edited:
Weather can be an unforgiving tyrant - that's what wrong with being a farmer or rancher. The coming cold turn is likely to be a long row to hoe but it is not an extinction event . . . yet.
A garden is just part of prepping and it does aid your survival. I on't have a garden that's big enough to supply all I need but it is a great way to supplement those things we eat a lot of.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top