I see this all the time:
People who live in cities think its better to be in a group.
Most city folk tend to expect the government to save them and provide for them. I guess that depends on the city and how many people live there (all metro areas included in that population)
People with short range rifles don't think long range rifles will be needed....people with long range rifles think they are the best way to win a fight.
Long range is great if you have a hill top to settle in to, but they will work close up if needed. Short range have their purposes too, and if you practice enough you can get them to reach out a few hundred yards. But both will require continued practice.
People don't have a BIL, think no house is defensible. People with a BIL, think all the BOL people are going to die on the road.
If city folk are hoping to bug out of the city they need to do it sooner than later. The longer the trouble makers have to figure things out and make plans the more possible it will be for them to block the exit paths. Many highways have choke points where turning around is nearly impossible. And, bugging out is only possible if the tank is full and extra fuel is accessible.
People in open land think that will protect them, people in the woods think the concealment will protect them...
Both have their pros and cons.
People without a 4wd vehicle think 2WD is better, people with 4WD think 2WD is useless....
2wd may be better for fuel economy, until some vehicles are dead in the road and there is a need to get off the pavement to get around the obstacles.
Don't forget the vehicle of choice needs to be large enough to pack up whatever clothes, jackets, boots, meds, food, weapons, etc., plus however many people. Even if the BOL is supplied you need some or most of these items for the drive getting there. What some people think may be a few hour drive may end up being a 3 day adventure in reality.
I see it everyday, and am 'guilty' of it myself.
The question is, how do you tell the difference between making smart use of the situation you are in, with letting the situation you are in, determine your views on the situation you SHOULD be in?
Is it even possible? or desirable? Are we all just victims of circumstance or past decisions?
Also, it depends on the situation dealt to each area. We saw people upended by fires last month. This month they claim mud slides will be a major problem, even for those who were lucky enough to survive the fires. Some of them mud slides will be impassible with most 4wd vehicles so vehicle choice is a moot point in that situation. Oh, which brings me to the point that MOST 4wd and AWD vehicles are not truly 4 wheel drive. If the front and rear axles are not "locking" axles you will have 1 front tire driving/spinning and on rear tire driving/spinning. Most people find this lack of true 4 wheel drive after they are stuck, they just never truly studied the vehicle before buying it, and except for a very few locations in the country where the dealership manager and the customers know what is needed for major snow storms or heavy mud issues on back roads or in fields the dealerships wont order the 4wd trucks with locking axles. Both my Avalanche and my Dodge Ram have locking axles, because I ordered them that way for a reason.