I don't think urges/desires/temptations define us. I don't think our misperceptions of reality define us. We are what we are, regardless of our urges or misperceptions. Reality is reality. Urges or misperceptions are just that, an urge to change current reality on the one hand, or an inability to perceive current reality 100% correctly on the other.
Urges: If we want to engage in an act, that doesn't necessarily make us an "actist" or an "actual." Urges or desires don't turn us into Urgists or Desirists. For example, a homosexual urge does not make us a homosexual, just like an urge to masturbate doesn't make one a masturbationist, or an urge toward marital infidelity means one has always been a cheater-sexual. We are humans. We just have urges or desires...call them inclinations if you want...in some contexts they might be called temptations. We all have urges of different types. I know many people have urges that do not interest me in the slightest, and vice-versa...so it is sometimes hard for us to sympathize with others because their urges are so foreign to us. Urges or desires can be minor or major...they can be benign or harmful...they can be moral or immoral...they can be a lot of things, but in my opinion, they don't define us. We are humans. We have free will. We can embrace our urges (at which point in time we decide to define ourselves according to our urges) or we can choose to labor against them (we decline to put ourselves in a box). That is the beauty (and the burden) of being a human. We can choose.
Perceptions: If we are one thing (a particular age, a particular sex, a particular race, a two armed person), our misperception of age, sex, race, appendage status (a real thing...google it...some people think they have an arm that doesn't belong to them) doesn't change our biological age, biological sex, biological race or biological appendage status. We are what we are. Misperceptions can be managed...or they can be surrendered to. They may not be harmful. But, if they start to cause harmful behavior, to others or to ourselves, then help should be sought. It may be a rough road, but help is out there...although in today's world, you might have to look far for it if a political movement thinks it can use you. Which brings me to...
Politics/Groupism: I'm a libertarian (neither liberal nor conservative) when it comes to others. So, as long as someone else is not harming others due to their urges or their misperceptions, I'm pretty much live and let live. What business is it of mine (and of the government's), after all, if there are no physical victims that need protection? But, I do think medical help and counseling should be made available for those who want it. Liberals would deny this aid to people who have urges or misperceptions which can be used for political advantage for their party. They trumpet select urges and misperceptions in an effort to define people by those urges, to split them into groups of humans defined by their urges or their misperceptions. Separate groups help political parties stay in power. They can be pitted against one another. They can be a great source of votes. Inter-group conflict can motivate people to vote a certain way who would otherwise not be political. It is unfortunate, but "getting along" doesn't get people to vote, so getting along is often not the goal of political parties; quite the opposite. Groupism is like meth for a political party...it is hard for them to quit. And, in a lonely world, seeking out an apparently friendly group, even one which may harm us in the long run, is often seen as the best way to deal with that loneliness in the short run.
Now, having said all of that, I am not a behavioral scientist. That is just me being me; that is how I see the world.
Granted, I do choose a religious lifestyle for myself. You could say I am biased because of that, although I would never seek to impose my religious beliefs on someone else...I will stick to words and persuasion when it comes to that. Coercion has no legitimate place in spreading religion. I will just say that I chose to believe in religion because I thought it would be the best way for me to control my urges. I did a pretty good job controlling my actions as an atheist, but I thought choosing religion would help me better control my urges. These are hard issues to discuss, and I know that many people are convinced that they don't have choice, because their urges are so strong. I get that. I guess I think (rightly or wrongly) that people have more choice than they give themselves credit for. That doesn't mean acting on those choices is easy. But, taking the first step of believing that you have choice...that is a very empowering thing.
I hope the above is taken as it is intended...just me describing my thoughts on these issues. If it offends, I'm happy to delete it.