Just to state upfront under no circumstances am I calling you a liar by my prior posts, I said it was rhetoric likely to decrease antagonism by PETA and SPCA folk against the practice which has overtime been more and more regulated by government, likewise the idea of a mean old trapper ripping the skin off of cute animals is not one most people want for fear of having fake blood and tomatos thrown at them.
On the contrary I just have seen no evidence people should go out practicing snaring on live animals thinking no harm could come of it. Oh I'm not youtube wiki based but these are often accessible means of getting information from credible organizations whereby other people will not have access to other sources. If you want to debunk the youtube videos I posted I invite you but I am quite convinced that they are authentic. I'm not someone oblivious to physics sciences were actually my highest grades and I've gone on to do science and engineering related learning such as for my advanced amateur radio certification, geophysical sciences, space sciences, and rocket science. I'm not claiming to be a genius and I am certainly NOT calling you a liar, but I do think that your position is not heavy on the evidence, and you seem to just have a different standard of "harm" and potential for harm. I think that is perhaps what it amounts to.
Regardless some inexperienced trapper has a much higher chance of injuring an animal, in that "small percentage" than a professional trapper does. That is like going into hunting as a hobby and just handing someone a gun and saying go get them varmints. Fact is hunters ain't suppose to go out and blow holes in animals they are suppose to go out and take the animal down preferably with one shot kill.
You seem to be saying, no harm can come of it to the animal when you are really saying, hurting the animals doesn't matter they'll recover and if they don't they are just a stupid animal, now go get your flu shot.
btw --- I sort of think quite a few animals caught in snares, are "harmed" as part of their march to death or escape from the shackles at whatever cost necessary.
How many animals have you found dead in your traps Was it a fun death some massive MDMA overdose or doped up on painkillers?
Is onekind a group filled with moronic propaganda masters? I havn't seen anything that does not look authentic.. can you perhaps point out how the onekind link is wrong?
Ok and thankyou now how does some newbie go out and do the non locking snaring, is there a youtube video on this?
amazingly when you type in non locking snare into youtube you only get videos on making locking snares... odd hmm, and when you try nonlocking snare you get no hits.
Basically what you are saying is having metal wire coated in chalk but one that only lashes across their body at high speed will cause no harm, when it is much better to say it will cause less harm than a locking snare.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but have you tested these non locking snares on yourself and can you attest you felt no pain in the snare being sprung? After you have spring that snare on yourself hopefully with video you will have much more evidence. Now what if fur got stuck in the catch? hmm could that not cause it to lock?
have you tested it on your fingers, your wrist, your neck, your foot etc... if so great post up the video to sooth the SPCA folk out there and demonstrate it is harmless.
I have this feeling the idea you are supporting here is what hurts humans doesn't hurt animals, abuse of humans isn't applied at the same standard as abuse of animals, animals can take more pain without being hurt, am I wrong?
Wow. This will likely be my last reply to you as your train of thought is all over the place and it's almost impossible to reasonably piece together a courteous and informative response for you.
Rhetoric in it's traditional format is something I'm versed in. Rhetoric contains proofs. I've given you two proofs. You've stated that my word is not good enough and you don't believe my understanding of harm is reasonable. You've also said that I think the game that I trap are stupid. You can phrase it how you want to, but saying that you can't find methods of live snare sets or non killI snare sets on YouTube or Google that the proofs in my "rhetoric" lack evidence, you are implyng that i am falsifying information inside my posts to throw off attacks of organizations that actually fund my work.
I'll end with two solid points:
1. I can, with certainty, say from your responses to my proofs, that while you may have an idea of physics, you have little knowledge of modern snare sets or the materials that are used in one.
If you did, you would know that coated cable is used, locking mechanisms meant for live snares don't lock if fur gets wedged in between it and the cable, the only force used to set live snares has to be the game's own rate of travel.
So, me explaining to you the above methods,
is akin to me explaining to someone without a veterinary sciences degree that the most efficient way to get superficial modulus, when repairing a gastrol tear, is to not clamp and tie the bile ducts, but stimulate the sphincter like involuntary muscular response by having a technician stroke it gently. You likely won't debate that fact that I know to be true from practice nor will you find that on YouTube or Google. The difference is, accepting one does not require you to admit you are likely wrong and there are humane ways for honing a man's snaring abilities without dispatching game out of season.
2. I never even watched your youtube video because I have known for years that the world is full of all types of people. I don't need a video to tell me that anymore than I need to Google PETA or SPCA to know that there are people who say those folks and alike are hypocrites because of their elevation of the value of a life in the animal Kingdom over the value of a life in the insect Kingdom as they all likely use some form of pest control. (I'd rather have neck broke by a snare than be made to die of thirst froze inside my own body from be doused with boric acid.