If they have probable cause to believe a felony is or has been committed then it is my understanding it need not be committed in their presence. Committed in their presence only applies to misdemeanors.Unfortunately in this case your both right. A domestic violence call was made. They have probable cause to investigate. How ever they don't have a right to enter without warrant unless an active crime was committed in their presents, and said person was seen fleeing into the house. We also don't see the beginning of the video because the individual didn't start recording until later. Once again if you just look at the video itself it seems condemning. But the whole story isn't there. I don't think the tazer was necessary I didn't see enough resistance to deem it required but I also wasn't there and can't see the level of resistance. Hard one to call.
I wasn't there so I can't say for sure but from all my experiences with LEO's I believe that they are the guys that got picked on in high school and now they got a gun and a badge so it's payback time. Look at the facts LEO’s get paid very little for what they are supposed to do, in today’s society there are few motivating factors the biggest one for most people is money. If cops aren’t doing their job for money then why? Authority over others. It’s a big power trip for these guys. There were at least four cops there; if they were really concerned with helping the people wouldn’t their time be better spent checking the terrorist watch list for names like Tsarnaev or Obama.
I will not post or publish my service record
Enter your email address to join: