Ukraine is a European problem. Finland and Sweden want to join NATO for protection from Russia. Who is doing the protecting in reality? The USA. There are not enough teats on Uncle Sam for all the Europeans to suck on. Cut them loose. The US needs to get out of NATO and its problems. Let the Europeans grow up.
Russia Versus The Ukraine
- Thread starter Jayson
- Start date
Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:
Jim’s Rant For The Day. I am Stunned And Never Saw It coming!
Tonight the Senate blocked the $40 Billion funding for the politicians and Ukraine war for the Elite.
Could it be the result of the alternative news media educating the US citizens as to the games being played against the citizens?
Are the corrupt politicians now afraid of the masses?
See: $40 Military Billion in Aid to Ukraine BLOCKED in U.S. Senate
Tonight the Senate blocked the $40 Billion funding for the politicians and Ukraine war for the Elite.
Could it be the result of the alternative news media educating the US citizens as to the games being played against the citizens?
Are the corrupt politicians now afraid of the masses?
See: $40 Military Billion in Aid to Ukraine BLOCKED in U.S. Senate
Let’s give credit where it is due. Senator Rand Paul is the one that stopped the bill! McConnell is pushing it!
Andrew Carnegie, the circa 1900 steel giant, was once asked "Which is the most important person in a new business venture: The one with the idea, the capital or the business expertise?"
His response was "Which is the most important leg on a three legged stool?"
His response was "Which is the most important leg on a three legged stool?"
there's "Biden Cash" in that there bill >>>> all kinds of ????s of the proposed spending of the funds - Why are Euro weapons being purchased? - Why are expansive, sophisicated and long lead delivery weapon systems locked in? - Why are weapons that are counter to NATO requirements being proposed? - Refugee reinbursement to countries that accepted UK border crossers - Lots, Lots and Lots of Biden fudge in the $40B that has absolutely nothing to do with politics but pure 100% averse greed .....
Man, I wouldn't want to be in HIS shoes.
needs to be done - more urgently than ever - need to stop Putin's expansion invasion plans once & forever >>>
Putin has managed to attack Ukraine because Obammy joined Germany & France with their arms embargo - 8 years Ukraine couldn't get a single bullet to move toward their NATO requirements - 100% appeasing Putin - Prez Trump screwed the timetable - Old Hellery was supposed to have the keys to the WH - Putin had to wait on a bumbling stumbling thief to be in the WH ...
Putin has plans to move thru Finland and then drive south thru Sweden into NATO's Euro heart - he's counting on keeping the door open in Ukraine and access to his invasion ROUTES - he preparing Serbia to be ready teddy ally for a invasion drive south ....
box the azzhole in from all sides - one single move and he trips his own destruction thru mutual NATO treaty support
He ain't going out without a fight and Trump kept him in check.
I don't think it will happen too fast with a coup against Putin either. He has made a lot of people rich (and himself) but many of them are paying the price now with their rich houses and ships being grabbed by the politicians....
time will tell, as it always does.
time will tell, as it always does.
the first Ukraine killed body bags are just hitting back across Russia - when the full scope of the Ukraine disaster becomes known >> Putin might be facing a good old fashion revolt by the peons >>> already more dead in Ukraine than the years & years of war in Afghanistan - and that mistep helped take out the USSR ....
Agreed. Europe never would have been able to afford Socialism if it hadn't been for leaning on America's military for defense. Of course they still went broke, but not until they altered the minds of their people into entitlement whores.
Last edited:
Maybe it’s the very reason why Europe is the way she is today simply because of the support the American globalists gave to the usurping of the Russian empire which in turn led to much of the destruction and reshaping of Europa when America financed the Bolsheviks and radicals like Trotsky and Lenin. And who happily continued to fund the than Communist regime in Russia with a endless supply of war materials through their lend lease during the most crucial yrs of the 2nd world war against the last bastion of freedom the Third Reich . America has always been a milk cow for the globalist agenda in destroying the sovereignty of others that stand in their way of the quest for a new world order
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,638
What are you smoking Ling??
somehow the US staying behind after WW1 and fighting the Communists gets lost and of course the US didn't fight a couple of wars and numerous skirmishes from 1945 to the present KGB Putin's Ukraine invasion >>> the US only assisted the commies
Jup. They fought togehter. The US delivered a lot of money and gear to the soviet union to fight the soldiers of the third Reich, which the US-banksters financed to increase might and force. They are all playing just the game of money.
The role the US actually plays is also (imho) just homemade. Insinsting on beeing the number 1 country in the world means to keep the others short. This they did with Nato also.
To join Nato, which once had a active opponent, means the big american war machine is the protector of the "free world". (Which means the rest of the world has to be bad or devilish)
When the economical trouble entered US soil (or got mentionable) the shouts out of the white house broke loose that the rest of Nato should deliver more (troops, money, gear). But over here there are no warloving people. Sadly especially the Germans are told (don´t ask by whom) and taught to be bending buckling pazifists. A lot of our people carry this in their hearts and minds. What response was expected?
I don´t get why Finnland want´s to join that construct of moneyeating warloving politicans called Nato. Fear, energetic safety or the hope for peace is no logic argument. The Finns are the only country throughout europe who can protect the lives of all the citizens in bunkers. They did their homework. Why should the bad russian enemy attack there and bite it´s teeth out?
I´d like to see Nato dissolve. Unfortunatley it seems to end in a big flash or something else likewise destruktive.
Dr Henley me not smoke. But general Patton smoke very much.
Illini I’m not exactly sure what you mean by the the American staying behind to fight the commies after WW1. There were plenty communists trying to overthrow Germany after WW 1. But that was something that German storm troopers and right wing groups overcame. The only other place I can think of in that time period would be the allied expeditionary force that supposedly went to help the white army to fight the Bolsheviks in Russia. As to America fighting in other conflicts that they have. Some good some bad. As to KGB Putin . He be ex KGB now. Just think of Saul on the road to Damascus he now be known as the Paul. People do change : )
Last edited:
there's a WHOLE lot you don't know about history >>> try Googling Polar Bear Expedition - might actually learn a little truth in life
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,638
Ling I have no problem believing that the Soviets were worse than the Nazis, or that the Nazis were stalwarts of anti-Communism. Doesn't make the Nazis good. They were both bad, but the Soviets just had longer to practice their evil than the Nazis did.
Illini I think I did mention the allied expeditionary force in my previous reply which included many other allied nations including yours. Their reasons for being in Russia are various. For some it was to do with the success that the Germans were having on the eastern front. For others they were more concerned with the Bolsheviks taking Russia out of the war with the signing of the Brest agreement. This all came in stages and with different contingents arriving when they were able. Others like Winston Churchill in one of his more visionary moments of enlightenment being a Zionist was horrified at the ideology of the Bolsheviks. As to the American side of things they were stationed at Arkangel and Vladivostok they were there for a number of purposes. That being to protect the Siberian railway and American assets. That being the massive stock piles of munitions originally meant for the Russian army in its war with Germany . And maybe also to keep a eye on any Japanese.territorial expansion into Siberia. The Americans were also there to help the Czechoslovak legion of some 40 thousand to evacuate for the western front in the European theatre of war. As to fighting the Bolsheviks that was never president Wilsons interest or desire nor the reality to fight the Bolsheviks . As there was very few Bolshevik forces in that area of Siberia at the time. All nations did leave Russia at different stages once the Bolshevik take over and leadership were officially recognised.
Dr Henley why is the Third Reich always portrayed as pure evil even more so by most when compared to the communist ideology that had destroyed the best of Russia.and eventually had.it’s way with most of Europe too. Whose ideology is alive and well in China today and in your nation and my country and many other nations throughout the world . So tell me what made National Socialist Germany just a little less evil than communism. I’d like to know
he's nothing but a troll - just look at his postings - no prepper content - just political trolling - hit the abuse button and lets Trotsky his azz ....
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,638
Just my musings on the subject, I don't have all the answers. (however I did read the entire unabridged Gulag Archipelago
)The Nazis were more up front about it, maybe even more "honest" about it (?), while the Communists are more insidious and lie about everything. That makes the Nazis seem more evil on the surface while the Communists always have some stupid explanation that the sheople believe.
If you judge purely by how many lives were destroyed, there is no comparison, the Communists win the "baddie award" hands down. But like I said, they had more time to practice.
My problem was with you calling the Third Reich a "bastion of freedom." That had me scratching my head.
Last edited:
This is not merely a prepper site . Maybe you have tunnel vision upon reading the many different forums You seem to have a history of calling anyone a troll who disagrees with you. As to my azz. Keep your hands off my azz vegemite boy
Dr Henley I can understand why you may scratch your head. But you must look upon the situation of why many willingly chose to fight for the Third Reich . The Bolshevik tyranny was known well enough throughout Europe for its murderous debauchery whenever communism took control of a nation little lone it’s own people. When you refer to Alexander Solzhenitsyns Archipelago from the classic trilogy. You be referring to a similar barbarity in the German concentration camps as well. I do recall Germans bayoneting Belgium babies for fun in the First World War and crucifying Canadian soldiers upon crosses. All were mere allied propaganda stories but at least we had the decency to call them just propaganda at wars end. The 2nd word war was much different. Propaganda lies remain as truth and now as law until this very day. Glad you have a unabridged copy of Archipelago as much of Solzhenitsyns work is often edited for political reasons. It’s very hard to find a trustworthy English edition of his last great work 200 yrs together
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,638
It's available online now and I have a copy. At the time, I had to check out an ancient copy at the public library. I can't vouch for the accuracy of the translation, but the book made a HUGE impression on me.
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,638
No, I'm referring to the idiocy and inhumanity of the Soviet policies and the devastation it caused to ordinary Russians, such as this passage (which really stuck in my mind):
In 1934 Pskov agronomists sowed flax on the snow--exactly as Lysenko had ordered. The seeds swelled up, grew moldy, and died. The big fields lay empty for a year. Lysenko could not say that the snow was a kulak or that he himself was an ass (arse). He accused the agronomists of being kulaks and of distorting his technology.
And the agronomists went off to Siberia.
