The Perfect Bunker

shop deals on amazon
Shop deals on ebay
Advertise with us
Homesteading & Country Living Forum

Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
PrepperQ

PrepperQ

Friend
Neighbor
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
8
Location
USA
I have been looking online recently at bunker solutions and come across a bunch of blogs and websites saying that a bunker is not a realistic way to survive in the long term. Personally i take that as a challenge. The reason i am opening this thread is to start a discussion about what it would take to survive for an extremely long time (indefinitely, if possible) in a 100% sealed off bunker provided money is no object. I want the bunker system to be able to scale from 5 people to potentially 100+. The disaster we are planning for is anything and everything from a super volcano to all out nuclear war. I have broken this problem up into 4 separate parts, but feel free to solve problems i haven't yet thought of.

1. Water
- Possibly use a WRS (water recovery system) that can reclaim waste and washing water.
2. Air
- I really like the idea of using plant to "grow fresh air" Referenced here: http://wondergressive.com/three-plant-fresh-air-system/
3. Food
- I think tying this into #2 would work best using a closed loop aquaponics system growing vegetables and fish/ crawfish along side the before mentioned fresh air plants.
4. Energy
- This is the hardest for me i like the idea of solar and wind but i don't like the idea of being visible from the surface and opening the bunker up to theft. The real issue with energy in my mind is the storage, batteries are great and no bunker can go without but they do have a shelf life and from what i found the best can only last like 15 years tops. The best way i have thought of is to store the parts to the batteries and build them as needed but i have no experience and am not even sure if its possible.
 
if money isn't a problem,hmm,what comes into my mind is that you build it along the specs of a nuclear sub,but that isn't possible so..

but with a reactor and some salt water you would have a chance to make your own air 'cause those thingies are more or less self sufficent in that way, food will be the problem,anything happens in that chain and your a@@ is cooked.
you would need some seriously good techs in your group,if you were going to build stuff like batteries your life depends on..

have you thought about that "cabin fever"?? closed indoors for a long time,no sun,no sky,you'll have to deal with that too.
 
A totally self contained hermetically sealed and self sufficient bunker would need to be very large and insanely expensive, and of course NEVER DISCOVERED because the more self contained it is the easier it is for others to make sure you never come out again !!! The best bet I think is a reasonably secure but remote homestead.
 
I personally would shy away from using nuclear power in the bunker, in part because that's what I'm potentially hiding from and because I don't know that much about it.
You also raised a good point about cabin fever. I suppose an entertainment room a gym would be a start. Maybe a bar/ distillery would help but that could be a slippery slope.
And in regards to the food I have a good amount of experience when it comes to aquoponics and I feel with enough fail safes and maintenance it could be the long term food solution I've been looking for.
I'm more tackling this as a mental exercise then a practical application. I am intrigued by the idea of having everything people need to survive in a man made biosphere type environment.
 
that biosphere would need to be built kinda so it looked nice :) not like your average bunker ;)

true about that slippery slope,people must then be activated and kept busy so they don't have the time to just sit down for R&R all the time.
 
Ive been staring at "average bunker" in the rear view mirror for a while now haha.
And yes I believe there was but the way I see it if this "Perfect Bunker" had to be used it is truly the last ditch effort for survival and as long as it's treated as a community and everyone has a job to do and adequate space it should function the same way a small town or compound would on the surface.
 
keep everyone busy, reminds me of the army;keep the boys busy so the don't have time to think about mischief ;)
 
Exactly haha. I have been a little obsessed with this concept for a while. I have thought about growing medical plants, algae for biofule, hell even a bee sanctuary for honey hahaha. Anything to make the bunker more habitable but I always get caught up on energy storage and production. There are nearly infinite ways to generate electricity but storage is a whole nother ball game.
 
NASA might have a solution about energy....or not,that will be one key issue to solve,when that's done,it will provide answers to alot of others.
 
When in doubt ask NASA lol. Their clean air study was what started off this whole idea
 
The clean air study? Its completed, or as completed as NASA can be with a study. The link in my first post references it but a quick Google search will turn up way more plants that they used.
 
I seem to have reasonable good quality of air where I live,thanks to the forrest around me and keep as many plants indoor as possible too,they do clean the air indoors.

have to make some reading when I come back from work this evening.
 
Yeah check it out. The TED Talk "growing clean air" is awesome too, it talks about the study and how important clean air is.
 
it's important and as almost ready paramedic I've found out that more than enough....and my only bad habit is still the smokes :oops:

this is why I love this forum,you'll always get something new to think and do :)
 
Occasionally you can find an old decommissioned missile silo for sale. Usually in Montana or North Dakota I think. With a lot of work and enough $$ they could be made in to a livable bunker. Not sure that I'd want to live underground. I've spent a lot of time in underground mines and prefer being above ground.
 
The thing with bunkers is whilst they are SUPERB at protecting you from a nuclear blast or moab, or tornado, fire storm, hurricane etc then go from being safe havens to potential metal coffins when the threat is a bunch of nut jobs on the outside wating to take or destroy what is on the inside.

ANY good bunker must have above all else MULTIPLE concealed escape routes, Well sealed, water proof, fire proof, air tight, self sufficient etc all GREAT facets for surviving disasters, but not so good from protecting you from human attackers, Look at Fort Eben Emeal in Belgium it was supposed to be impreganable, but the Germans took it.

The greatest way of not being attacked by bad people is still not to be found in the first place.
 
Check into geothermal energy.

Also, you could still have surface solar panels and windmills, etc. They could simply be some distance from the shelter and cable the power feed.

Likewise, you could surround panels with foliage to avoid detection from the ground. (windmills, not so much).
 
Possibly I could have retractable solar panels, it would make maintenance easier and keep them hidden at night.
 
Wherever your plans to build a bunker just make sure you are not to close to open water sources or saturated grounds unless you want to be permanently entombed through a process known as liquefaction though that depends where you live. For me, I don't necessarily want to be in a bunker where I am at, liquefaction can make the ground like concrete. Hopefully your not in a earthquake prone area.

708541.jpg
 
You proposal can only be addressed in one company that I am aware of that has the experience and undertaking to make that a reality.

Hardened Shelters. They have had DOD and other government contracts. They are not cheap, and when I say not cheap, you'd better have an unlimited account, as they will expect a sizeable down payment before any build is done.

As for living in underground, you and other hit it on the data slate...NASA, look at the data from long existence in the International Space Station. It will give you some idea of challenges that will be faced.

The rule of thumb for underground space is 200 square feet per person. Can't remember where I saw that, but its a good rule to follow.
 
Yeah I also don't like the idea of being above ground. My current setup is all underground. Obviously I may run into fuel issues, but I'd rather have that and have my generator die than be discovered and raided.
 
Maverick said:
Wherever your plans to build a bunker just make sure you are not to close to open water sources or saturated grounds unless you want to be permanently entombed through a process known as liquefaction though that depends where you live. For me, I don't necessarily want to be in a bunker where I am at, liquefaction can make the ground like concrete. Hopefully your not in a earthquake prone area.

View attachment 5959
Click to expand...

That is actually identical to my own car a Suzuki Wagon R Plus
 
but whatever bunker type you go into,discard that shipping container,this is from what I've read here,too risky,too much work to make them safe.
it would be neet to have an underground facility with geo-thermal as a back-up place
...and enough of money to spend on it to make it nice and comfy and SECURE, one reason I will do everything to avoid going to the shelter here at my apartment complex...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top