"TURD'BRAIN" will be super sorry if he hits Alaska. Even if an accident, and "NO" bomb.

Homesteading & Country Living Forum

Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Sourdough

"Eleutheromaniac"
HCL Supporter
Neighbor
Joined
Mar 17, 2018
Messages
7,797
Location
ALASKA
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/...y-after-north-korea-fires-missile-which-flies
Excerpt:
According to South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, North Korea’s intermediate-range ballistic missile flew ~4,500km with an apogee of ~970km, reaching a speed of Mach 17 before splashing in the Pacific ocean, some 2800 nautical miles east of Korea, having traveled above Japan. The JSC added that South Korea and US intelligence authorities are still analyzing more details.

South Korea slammed the North Korean ballistic missile launch, saying it deters peace and security of the Korean Peninsula and the international community, and it strongly condemns it as the launch is a clear breach of UN Security Council resolutions.

South Korea's president also chimed in, vowing a "stern response" to North Korea's missile launch.

* * *

The Japanese government warned residents in some remote islands that are part of Tokyo as well as Hokkaido and Aomori prefectures to take shelter from a missile fired from North Korea.

〔Live streaming〕The Japanese government is warning that North Korea appears to have launched at least one ballistic missile. There's a possibility it's heading toward Japan. The government is urging everyone in the country to take shelter immediately.TV Live | NHK WORLD-JAPAN Live & Programs
— NHK WORLD News (@NHKWORLD_News) October 3, 2022
 
Last edited:
I thought he and Rodman were an item back in the day? Couple o' queers that nobody really cared about or understood, lol. And who gives a $h!t anyway, AYE? When the missiles come closer, THAT will be the time to worry, if the scumbag hasn't already been taken out... until then, the fat little NK **** will just be the "Rocket Man" as sung by another Darwin Failure, a.k.a. Elton John. Give me the gay Morrissey squawker any day of the week, at least he knows to stay the heck outta politics, that friggin' musical genius, lol... :confused:
 
Last edited:
RODman...yeah, thought it was Shaq the greasy little runt had the hots for.
Shows how much attention I pay to sports. but hey, trump has those HUGE HANDS. maybe the little freak was hoping the Don would seduce him and make him his bangbang girl?
Don would b1tch slap him so hard his teeth would get here long before one of his beer can and bailing wire missiles.
 
None of this would happen under POUS Trump.
I think he would have bomb Moscow & Beijing to stop a war, after walking into North Korea to prove he was not scared of anyone, least of all a country smaller than one of his many states back home.
 
NK has huge amount of submarines as many as u.s. or more. they are all old subs but are in working order. they have limited use. BUT..wait for it..they are the old disel/battery type subs. guess what...we had war games and our carrier got sunk every time from electric sub because they cant be tracted.it disturbed us so much we borrowed an electric sub from..norway,sweden somewhere for over a year. recently NK launched a bunch of subs and we admitted we didnt know where they went because couldnt track them. NK also has one old nuclear sub from back in USSR days.

those diesel/electric subs have so much value that RF and China are now developing a new batch and they run on something new..something about battery charging while submerged or something another.i forget exact details. i think i posted about it here before.

but anyhow these new subs are for coastline guarding. these things will prevent the u.s. from setting up carriers to conducting bombing on countries i do believe in future.

NK also according to our military has as much artillery as us.
 
Agreed that diesel/battery subs are hard to detect. Pretty sure many countries are producing them now so I wouldn't necessarily say they're old.

According to this site (which rates the military capabilities and such for each country), NoKo has about 1/2 the amount of subs that we do.
https://www.globalfirepower.com/navy-submarines.php
NoKo's total military power ranks #30 in the world. That puts them just below Thailand.
 
Agreed that diesel/battery subs are hard to detect. Pretty sure many countries are producing them now so I wouldn't necessarily say they're old.

According to this site (which rates the military capabilities and such for each country), NoKo has about 1/2 the amount of subs that we do.
https://www.globalfirepower.com/navy-submarines.php
NoKo's total military power ranks #30 in the world. That puts them just below Thailand.

do more digging..just couple years ago it was believed they had the most in world. even i found military stuff saying between 50some and 70 some. there was a military thing said NK had same amount of artillery as u.s. but the u.s. has that much again in reserves so we have double. but it does little good if you cant get it there and on shore to be used. its why i think the subs could hinder operations if it came to it.i am not saying diesel/batter is old i am saying the old subs NK has lots of are very old. i read many are ww2 stuff.

sidenote...we underestimated afghans in flip flops and ak's. NK has more stuff at his disposal.also many laughed at the little iranian sub they launched until a few weeks later it shot cruise missiles from it . pretty close to some of our ships and spooked everyone.

in our modern thinking we have seen much lopsided war as of late.the ukraine/russia conflict is showing old school war fare is ground and pound even in todays world.my 2 cents. NK has artliery on rails going back in cave systems. roll out fire and retreat back in. might be hard to get at without buncher buster big stuff. but who knows.i am tired of our tax dollars being used in korea. its not our fight any longer after all these decades.this is bulcrap over spending that broke egypt and then rome and many more..we are next if not already headed down that path. sick of spending for other countries..i want our money spent on our shores and fix our infrastructure...real sick of it in fact !
 
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/t...-submarines-just-how-dangerous-are-they-24199
Despite such an endorsement, the submarines are generally considered obsolete and are being phased out. In 2015, the Pentagon believed that North Korea has seventy submarines of unknown types on active duty. A multinational report on the sinking of the South Korean corvette ROKS Cheonan states that the KPN operated twenty Romeo-class submarines, forty Sang-O (“Shark”) class coastal submarines (SSCs), and ten midget submarines of the Yono class

this says 64-86 with link to see where figures came from in article.


https://www.19fortyfive.com/2022/08...underwater-coffins-or-threat-to-the-u-s-navy/
 
Last edited:
do more digging..just couple years ago it was believed they had the most in world. even i found military stuff saying between 50some and 70 some. there was a military thing said NK had same amount of artillery as u.s. but the u.s. has that much again in reserves so we have double. but it does little good if you cant get it there and on shore to be used. its why i think the subs could hinder operations if it came to it.i am not saying diesel/batter is old i am saying the old subs NK has lots of are very old. i read many are ww2 stuff.

sidenote...we underestimated afghans in flip flops and ak's. NK has more stuff at his disposal.also many laughed at the little iranian sub they launched until a few weeks later it shot cruise missiles from it . pretty close to some of our ships and spooked everyone.

in our modern thinking we have seen much lopsided war as of late.the ukraine/russia conflict is showing old school war fare is ground and pound even in todays world.my 2 cents. NK has artliery on rails going back in cave systems. roll out fire and retreat back in. might be hard to get at without buncher buster big stuff. but who knows.i am tired of our tax dollars being used in korea. its not our fight any longer after all these decades.this is bulcrap over spending that broke egypt and then rome and many more..we are next if not already headed down that path. sick of spending for other countries..i want our money spent on our shores and fix our infrastructure...real sick of it in fact !
But dude, they WANT us broken down and helpless, that's the idea. the coming war(s) will bankrupt the other three big players leaving the EU alone at the top of the heap.
 
wanted yall to see this so i went hunting for it....


https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...royed-us-navy-aircraft-carrier-war-game-49997

In 2005, USS Ronald Reagan, a newly constructed $6.2 billion dollar aircraft carrier, sank after being hit by multiple torpedoes.


Fortunately, this did not occur in actual combat, but was simulated as part of a war game pitting a carrier task force including numerous antisubmarine escorts against HSMS Gotland, a small Swedish diesel-powered submarine displacing 1,600 tons. Yet despite making multiple attacks runs on the Reagan, the Gotland was never detected.

This outcome was replicated time and time again over two years of war games, with opposing destroyers and nuclear attack submarines succumbing to the stealthy Swedish sub. Naval analyst Norman Polmar said the Gotland “ran rings” around the American carrier task force. Another source claimed U.S. antisubmarine specialists were “demoralized” by the experience.


How was the Gotland able to evade the Reagan’s elaborate antisubmarine defenses involving multiple ships and aircraft employing a multitude of sensors? And even more importantly, how was a relatively cheap submarine costing around $100 million—roughly the cost of a single F-35 stealth fighter today—able to accomplish that? After all, the U.S. Navy decommissioned its last diesel submarine in 1990.


snippet #2

However, the two-hundred-foot-long Swedish Gotland-class submarines, introduced in 1996, were the first to employ an Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) system—in this case, the Stirling engine. A Stirling engine charges the submarine’s seventy-five-kilowatt battery using liquid oxygen.

With the Stirling, a Gotland-class submarine can remain undersea for up to two weeks sustaining an average speed of six miles per hour—or it can expend its battery power to surge up to twenty-three miles per hour. A conventional diesel engine is used for operation on the surface or while employing the snorkel. The Stirling-powered Gotland runs more quietly than even a nuclear-powered sub, which must employ noise-producing coolant pumps in their reactors.
 
New Russian sub with new dooms day weapon capable of creating 1,600 ft radioactive tsunami goes missing.

That’s the sensationalized headline from the article to catch your attention. The story isn’t as dire. The sub is brand new probably undergoing its sea trials, and this dooms day weapon isn’t likely to be operational until 2027. The sub is based in the Arctic so it may be off the coast of the Alaskan coastline as we speak,

https://www.foxnews.com/world/russi...omsday-weapon-disappears-arctic-harbor-report
 
New Russian sub with new dooms day weapon capable of creating 1,600 ft radioactive tsunami goes missing.

That’s the sensationalized headline from the article to catch your attention. The story isn’t as dire. The sub is brand new probably undergoing its sea trials, and this dooms day weapon isn’t likely to be operational until 2027. The sub is based in the Arctic so it may be off the coast of the Alaskan coastline as we speak,

https://www.foxnews.com/world/russi...omsday-weapon-disappears-arctic-harbor-report
Does any of this remind you of "The Hunt for Red October"? Let's hope Alec Baldwin is not on the crew in the torpedo area.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top