Is the Food Shortage on Purpose?

[Haertig]

Even the main stream media is publishing stories across the globe about all the vaccine related deaths are mounting. I thought you would have seen some of it by now.

I have.

But that's a very long way from your claim:

It turned out it was a poison that was meant to kill off the population.

I haven't seen ANYTHING supporting this wild claim. Care to provide it?

 

[Magus]

I'm sure you must have some proof of that claim. Not that anyone expects you to provide it. So I'll keep asking the questions, and you can keep dodging answering them. We have a good little rhythm going here.

When you make an outrageous claim like you do above, the onus is on you to provide supporting information. Since that never seems to happen in your case, that's why you get these questions that you abhor.

"It turned out it was a poison that was meant to kill off the population." Even you must agree that a statement like that requires a little proof before being widely accepted by the general population.

Dude, I think he's at least 85% right. I mean look around! Food distribution hubs burning to the ground in every state, Truckers drove to a strike NOBODY is covering, killing jobs left and right and even paying people not to work, no perfect storm like this happens on its own! go somewhere else besides CNN, like Uncancelled news and just look around! Just because we're paranoid don't mean they're not out to get us! Hell, look at all the microbiologists that have "committed suicide" in the last decade, they can't all know Bill Clinton!

 

[Pearl]

Dude, I think he's at least 85% right. I mean look around! Food distribution hubs burning to the ground in every state, Truckers drove to a strike NOBODY is covering, killing jobs left and right and even paying people not to work, no perfect storm like this happens on its own! go somewhere else besides CNN, like Uncancelled news and just look around! Just because we're paranoid don't mean they're not out to get us! Hell, look at all the microbiologists that have "committed suicide" in the last decade, they can't all know Bill Clinton!

Some know Hillary too

 

[Haertig]

Dude, I think he's at least 85% right.

I agree, the probability is high that "something is going on". How much of that "something" can be attributed to malice, and how much to simple incompetence, is a question that I can't answer. If I was asked my opinion - and I know I wasn't - I would say that Pelosi and Schumer are malicious, while Biden and Harris are incompetent. Hillary Clinton is self-proclaimed royalty, AOC is low IQ, Obama is opportunist. So we have a real mix of talents here, that all add up to a disaster.

I have a suspicion that there are people who are trying to harness all these politician faults into a force to get their way. No proof of that, just a suspicion. So I believe we do kind of agree on several things (not trying to put words in your mouth).

However, "It turned out it was a poison that was meant to kill off the population" is a leap too far. Not supported by any evidence that I am aware of. This is something I would expect AOC might say if she were on the anti-vax side. I don't want to come down on AOC too hard. You gotta love her. Every declining political party needs a parasite gnawing at them from the inside to speed things up. AOC, and her squad, are those parasites. I hope the Dems continue electing them. The gift that "keeps on giving" to Republicans, year after year. Anyway, the point I was making is that AOC and her squad are not necessarily malicious, they're just idiots. Useful idiots.

 

[SheepDog]

If it was accidental it would have been stopped before it was shipped all over the globe. The paperwork released showed that Pfizer et al new it didn't work as advertised and that it would cripple or kill a high percentage. And they are still pushing it in some places?

 

[Curmudgeon]

And they are still pushing it in some places?

I get constant ads on the tube, now they have approved the Pfizer booster for kids.

 

[Magus]

There are no accidents, nothing is coincidence, how you perceive reality makes no difference.
If you drop the rock, it hits the ground, if you goose a tiger, you loose blood, and if you make
weekend plans, it will rain.

 

[Caribou]

I agree, the probability is high that "something is going on". How much of that "something" can be attributed to malice, and how much to simple incompetence, is a question that I can't answer. If I was asked my opinion - and I know I wasn't - I would say that Pelosi and Schumer are malicious, while Biden and Harris are incompetent. Hillary Clinton is self-proclaimed royalty, AOC is low IQ, Obama is opportunist. So we have a real mix of talents here, that all add up to a disaster.

I have a suspicion that there are people who are trying to harness all these politician faults into a force to get their way. No proof of that, just a suspicion. So I believe we do kind of agree on several things (not trying to put words in your mouth).

However, "It turned out it was a poison that was meant to kill off the population" is a leap too far. Not supported by any evidence that I am aware of. This is something I would expect AOC might say if she were on the anti-vax side. I don't want to come down on AOC too hard. You gotta love her. Every declining political party needs a parasite gnawing at them from the inside to speed things up. AOC, and her squad, are those parasites. I hope the Dems continue electing them. The gift that "keeps on giving" to Republicans, year after year. Anyway, the point I was making is that AOC and her squad are not necessarily malicious, they're just idiots. Useful idiots.

Brandon has always been incompetent. He has always been malicious. These are not mutually exclusive conditions. More people have been killed by these jabs than all other vaccines combined, ever. Tens of thousands at least. If it was accidental they would have pulled them off the market after 25 to 50 deaths, like every other vaccine. They knew the shots were killers, or do you have another explanation for why they changed the definition of "vaccine" to include the clot shots in the legal protections of real vaccines. Wait, wait, it hasn't been proven in court, why don't you throw that straw man out?

 

[Sourdough]

Brandon has always been incompetent. He has always been malicious. These are not mutually exclusive conditions. More people have been killed by these jabs than all other vaccines combined, ever. Tens of thousands at least. If it was accidental they would have pulled them off the market after 25 to 50 deaths, like every other vaccine. They knew the shots were killers, or do you have another explanation for why they changed the definition of "vaccine" to include the clot shots in the legal protections of real vaccines. Wait, wait, it hasn't been proven in court, why don't you throw that straw man out?

What troubles me the most is why the HELL, did America have 16 or 31 bio research labs in Ukraine......??? Why were we sponsoring at least "ONE" in China....?? And how many dozens or hundreds do we have scattered around the world....??? WHY......???????????

 

[Dani]

You only need invest two minutes to grasp this.

IRAN: Digital Food Rationing rolls out using Biometric IDs amid food riots - YouTube

Some have been saying this is the mark of the beast. Are they trying to force the ID under the skin?? I feel like the "End" is coming. The Government wants total control!!

 

[Haertig]

do you have another explanation for why they changed the definition of "vaccine" to include the clot shots in the legal protections of real vaccines

Yes. Similar to how advancements in the way we communicate caused the definition of "speech" to grow to include things like typing on these forums as we are doing now. Typing on computers was not included in the initial definition of speech. But it is now.

mRNA was not around when the word vaccine was initially defined. But with medical advances, we now have mRNA. So it is now included in the definition of a vaccine. It wasn't before, but that was because it didn't exist at the time.

Just like speech, a vaccine is best defined by what it is supposed to accomplish, not the details of how it accomplishes it. Used to be that "the written word" required paper of some form. Used to be that vaccines required a virus (dead or alive) as a component. Neither is true anymore. But we still call these things "the written word", and a "vaccine".

Do you know that the vaccines causing the most clots are not the mRNA ones, they the more traditional dead-virus-based ones like the Johnson&Johnson? Your term "clot shot" would better describe traditional vaccines, not mRNA vaccines. Although both can create clots, as any vaccine can.

 

[Neb]

There are no accidents, nothing is coincidence, how you perceive reality makes no difference.
If you drop the rock, it hits the ground, if you goose a tiger, you loose blood, and if you make
weekend plans, it will rain.

Wait what?

I will have to try that in August during a dry spell when the garden needs water.

Ben

 

[Haertig]

You only need invest two minutes to grasp this.

IRAN: Digital Food Rationing rolls out using Biometric IDs amid food riots - YouTube

Isn't this pretty much the same as Food Stamps? You can buy all the food you want on your own, but if you want someone else to pay for it, you have to have some form of proof/ID to show that you qualify for the freebie or subsidy.

I watched the first few minutes of this video, but then abandoned it when the presenter mentioned that this only applies to people wanting to to get subsidies. I would listen to arguments to the contrary, but my initial reaction is that requiring proof/ID to get a freebie/subsidy paid for by someone else is not unreasonable.

 

[Neb]

Isn't this pretty much the same as Food Stamps? You can buy all the food you want on your own, but if you want someone else to pay for it, you have to have some form of proof/ID to show that you qualify for the freebie or subsidy.

I watched the first few minutes of this video, but then abandoned it when the presenter mentioned that this only applies to people wanting to to get subsidies. I would listen to arguments to the contrary, but my initial reaction is that requiring proof/ID to get a freebie/subsidy paid for by someone else is not unreasonable.

In an ideal world where only those in need applied ID would not be required but....


In a world of less than perfect men seeking to exploit ... then ID would help prevent fraud supporting the black market.

Reasonable

Ben

 

[SheepDog]

Yes. Similar to how advancements in the way we communicate caused the definition of "speech" to grow to include things like typing on these forums as we are doing now. Typing on computers was not included in the initial definition of speech. But it is now.

mRNA was not around when the word vaccine was initially defined. But with medical advances, we now have mRNA. So it is now included in the definition of a vaccine. It wasn't before, but that was because it didn't exist at the time.

Just like speech, a vaccine is best defined by what it is supposed to accomplish, not the details of how it accomplishes it. Used to be that "the written word" required paper of some form. Used to be that vaccines required a virus (dead or alive) as a component. Neither is true anymore. But we still call these things "the written word", and a "vaccine".

Do you know that the vaccines causing the most clots are not the mRNA ones, they the more traditional dead-virus-based ones like the Johnson&Johnson? Your term "clot shot" would better describe traditional vaccines, not mRNA vaccines. Although both can create clots, as any vaccine can.

mRNA is a part of our genetic makeup. It has been in our bodies for millions of years. Our body uses it for all kinds of neat stuff.
The definition of a vaccine required the vaccine to carry a weakened or dead portion of the virus that would go into our memory of antiviral immunity. That definition also called for the vaccine to prevent the disease and prevent the spread of the disease.
The experimental gene therapy did none of that. It did force the body to make copies of the toxic spike proteins that although were connected to the virus were not part of the virus. They are not even close to a virus, they are a complex toxin.
The mRNA treatment did nothing to hinder or stop the spread, contraction or lessen the virus. It did weaken the immune system of most recipients and more so with each additional injection.

 

[Terri9630]

Isn't this pretty much the same as Food Stamps? You can buy all the food you want on your own, but if you want someone else to pay for it, you have to have some form of proof/ID to show that you qualify for the freebie or subsidy.

I watched the first few minutes of this video, but then abandoned it when the presenter mentioned that this only applies to people wanting to to get subsidies. I would listen to arguments to the contrary, but my initial reaction is that requiring proof/ID to get a freebie/subsidy paid for by someone else is not unreasonable.

That is a country full of people used to having those gov subsidies. The video was about the prices going so high that the gov can no longer afford those subsides.

 

[Pearl]

What troubles me the most is why the HELL, did America have 16 or 31 bio research labs in Ukraine......??? Why were we sponsoring at least "ONE" in China....?? And how many dozens or hundreds do we have scattered around the world....??? WHY......???????????

Some were making a lot of money!! It's all about personal gain, NOT America!

 

[Pearl]

Some have been saying this is the mark of the beast. Are they trying to force the ID under the skin?? I feel like the "End" is coming. The Government wants total control!!

Yes, "the mark"!!

 

[Pearl]

mRNA is a part of our genetic makeup. It has been in our bodies for millions of years. Our body uses it for all kinds of neat stuff.
The definition of a vaccine required the vaccine to carry a weakened or dead portion of the virus that would go into our memory of antiviral immunity. That definition also called for the vaccine to prevent the disease and prevent the spread of the disease.
The experimental gene therapy did none of that. It did force the body to make copies of the toxic spike proteins that although were connected to the virus were not part of the virus. They are not even close to a virus, they are a complex toxin.
The mRNA treatment did nothing to hinder or stop the spread, contraction or lessen the virus. It did weaken the immune system of most recipients and more so with each additional injection.

Thank you Sheepdog!!!

 

[SheepDog]

It's a good thing we are both married!