- Joined
- Dec 3, 2017
- Messages
- 23,073
No one should be made to take a shotAnd they should have had to get the so called vaccines or get out of office!!
No one should be made to take a shotAnd they should have had to get the so called vaccines or get out of office!!
I think those WHO KNEW how detrimental the shots are and excused themselves from them should have been given the SAME CHOICE as so many Americans!! Take your so called vaccine or leave your job!!No one should be made to take a shot
Cuba sucks. That's all I have to say about that. Wouldn't want to be them.
yes!! But we are not too far off....
Sorry do not know what i did here ,cannot see where to delete , lucky my finger is not on any launch buttonSorry, I did not intend to offend anyone. There are always exceptions to any generalization. I was thinking of the people who spend every dime they make without even considering their retirement. My son is one of these people. My daughter is exactly the opposite.
e.g., I do not mind giving a helping hand to those in need. We donate lots of money through our church for this purpose. But I do not like giving money as free handouts to people who simply have decided not to work and prefer to live off of others when they could work for themselves.
It is people that are similar to this latter group that I was talking about in my post about retirement savings above. The people who buy themselves a Mercedes when heir finances are more along the lines of a used Beetle. The two family household with an 8000 square foot house. People intentionally living above their means. There is nothing wrong with spending your money on luxuries if you can afford them. But ignoring your retirement is not "being able to afford" these things IMHO.
so you are never going to use medicare? It's funny, people say they don't want government healthcare but as soon as anyone suggests cuts to medicare they are hopping up and down crying usually. I seem to remember maybe Bush giving seniors more medicare benefits and nobody complained. ( could have been someone else but I think it was him)For those that want to be more self-reliant and free of dependency on government, universal healthcare would seem very scary. Forget your privacy and autonomy.
That is because the government has been taking money out of our paychecks for our entire working life to pay for Medicare. It is paid for by Social Security taxes which are mandatory withdrawals. We had no choice about the government taking that money.so you are never going to use medicare? It's funny, people say they don't want government healthcare but as soon as anyone suggests cuts to medicare they are hopping up and down crying usually.
standard response there, only most people pay in way less than they get outThat is because the government has been taking money out of our paychecks for our entire working life to pay for Medicare. It is paid for by Social Security taxes which are mandatory withdrawals. We had no choice about the government taking that money.
And now we want some rate of return on our money that was taken. So we use Medicare, since they won't give our money back to us in cash.
we were talking about having to pay into medicare when you are earning income but okMedicare doesn't take care of it all, you have to pay for a supplement and for a prescription coverage, and money is taken out of your SS benefit to pay for Medicare. I'd say we get less than we put in for sure. At least that's the case in our family.
That sounds like the classic "We know what's best for you" justification.standard response there, only most people pay in way less than they get out
Your math excludes lots of important factors. Like, most people make a lot more than $30k a year, so their contributions to Medicare go way up. Also, most people invest their money and earn lots more money off of that. It multiplies. And you forgot that Medicare withholding is 1.45% for the individual, but there is also an additional 1.45% withholding that the employer has to pay. They don't pay this out of the goodness of their little hearts, they reduce your salary to make up for these things they must pay. It's part of your "compensation package". You neglected to include any of this in your math. So while "math is fact", you have to include all the components if you want it to be relevant and useful fact. It is also well known that people of lower income receive more from the system than they contribute to it. I'm not against that. But you can't take conclusions drawn for lower income folks perspective and blindly apply those to higher income folks.Math is fact, you can't argue that away
There is another aspect of government supplied medical care and eliminating private healthcare. Doctors would have no choice but to work for the government at government deemed compensation.it would be a move toward mediocrity in medicine.That sounds like the classic "We know what's best for you" justification.
FWIW, like Amish Heart, our family gets far less out of Medicare than we paid into it.
Your math excludes lots of important factors. Like, most people make a lot more than $30k a year, so their contributions to Medicare go way up. Also, most people invest their money and earn lots more money off of that. It multiplies. And you forgot that Medicare withholding is 1.45% for the individual, but there is also an additional 1.45% withholding that the employer has to pay. They don't pay this out of the goodness of their little hearts, they reduce your salary to make up for these things they must pay. It's part of your "compensation package". You neglected to include any of this in your math. So while "math is fact", you have to include all the components if you want it to be relevant and useful fact. It is also well known that people of lower income receive more from the system than they contribute to it. I'm not against that. But you can't take conclusions drawn for lower income folks perspective and blindly apply those to higher income folks.
But even if we assumed your math was accurate, does that mean that someone should be able to "do the math", calculate an advantage, and then force you to do something you don't want to do - because they claim it's to your advantage? Heck, if that were the case, I'd be forced to install new windows, a new roof, updated A/C, better insulation, siding, solar panels, more efficient appliances, and all kinds of stuff to my house. Or so the salesmen tell me. I guess I'd have to buy an EV too.
Anyway, like I said, I may personally be against universal healthcare, but I would vote for it. To help my kids.
I made 26000 a year as an entry level engineer, I made 105000 as a project manager 20 years laterYour math excludes lots of important factors. Like, most people make a lot more than $30k a year, so their contributions to Medicare go way up.
actually the opposite is true. Most doctors in Germany are doctors because that is what they want to do. I went to school with a few people that became doctors and that is exactly what they wanted to do. Here in the US most likely many doctors become doctors for the money. ( and then there are those that are only doctors because of affirmative action, now that is another very scary topic)There is another aspect of government supplied medical care and eliminating private healthcare. Doctors would have no choice but to work for the government at government deemed compensation.it would be a move toward mediocrity in medicine.
Ben
Enter your email address to join: