- Joined
- Jun 25, 2020
- Messages
- 1,939
The only Toyota SUV that I would consider is a Highlander simply because it's built on a truck chassis. Very few SUVs are built on truck chassis's, Suburbans and Tahoes come to mind.
The mpg is a really important issue for a lot of people. Almost 100% of my driving is around town & our town is not even 10 miles across in most places. And I rarely make trips. So the millage doesn't matter to me. If I wanted I could drive on one tank of gas for a couple of months with planning. So my Highlander is perfect for me. Right now I've got a wheelchair strapped down in the back & when I picked up my wife from the airport there was still room for her luggage back there.Used cars can be a great deal if you do your homework. I normally buy 1 owner, dealer maintained and normally owned by the elderly vehicles.
We did buy a new RAV-4 a couple weeks ago. Had a really good deal on a used Highlander a couple months ago. Passed on it as it was too big (and had crap MPG's) for most of our family's needs. We have a truck for the big stuff and have a Lexus RX-350 (also crap MPG's), A Mazda CX-5 and a few sedans.
We live in an area with hilly terrain and the back roads aren't really maintained. In the truck and SUV's, the ride is pretty rough.
Me, I don't care. I drive very little (maybe 2500-3000 miles per year). My crew cab truck gets crap. My BMW is about the same. For me it's "smiles per mile".The mpg is a really important issue for a lot of people.
4runner and Tacoma share a frame.The only Toyota SUV that I would consider is a Highlander simply because it's built on a truck chassis. Very few SUVs are built on truck chassis's, Suburbans and Tahoes come to mind.
You're correct. My mistake. I knew Toyota built at least one SUV model on a truck frame.4runner and Tacoma share a frame.
Sequoia and Tundra share a frame.
The Highlander has always been a unibody platform.
Whether it's body on frame or unibody construction, it's still a damn nice vehicle and trusted for quality and reliability. If I had $50k lying around, I'd have one in my driveway...You're correct. My mistake. I knew Toyota built at least one SUV model on a truck frame.
Are you talking about SUVs in general?Whether it's body on frame or unibody construction, it's still a damn nice vehicle and trusted for quality and reliability. If I had $50k lying around, I'd have one in my driveway...
The Highlander.Are you talking about SUVs in general?
I'd go with a slightly older one. Something that has a V6 instead of the 4 cyl.The Highlander.
I get that. The 6 is a well proven engine. I bet Toyota's turbo 4 will hold up just as well though. It seems that Toyota likes to get the bugs worked out before they release new engines and transmissions...I'd go with a slightly older one. Something that has a V6 instead of the 4 cyl.
Agreed.I get that. The 6 is a well proven engine. I bet Toyota's turbo 4 will hold up just as well though. It seems that Toyota likes to get the bugs worked out before they release new engines and transmissions...
I'm actually thinking about a Toyota hybrid. They've proved to be so damn reliable that it almost doesn't make sense to get the regular gas ones.Agreed.
I love their 6-cyl engines. Damn near bulletproof. I have that engine in a 23 year-old Avalon and a newer Lexus RX-350. Except for a starter in the Avalon at age 22, I haven't had a single issue.
I'm in vehicle buying spree right now, especially if I want Toyota since most of their fleet is going hybrid starting next year. Bought a new RAV-4 a few weeks ago, a Mazda CX-5 a couple months ago. Have been thinking about a new Camry but I want the V6. Probably just buy another SUV (of some brand...).
To get the benefit of the hybrid, you need to drive it more than we actually do. I did the math a few weeks ago (and going from memory here), if you drive less than about 12-15,000 miles per year, the ICE is a better financial decision.I'm actually thinking about a Toyota hybrid. They've proved to be so damn reliable that it almost doesn't make sense to get the regular gas ones.
I drive 25,000 to 45,000 miles a year...To get the benefit of the hybrid, you need to drive it more than we actually do. I did the math a few weeks ago (and going from memory here), if you drive less than about 12-15,000 miles per year, the ICE is a better financial decision.
For you, it makes sense.I drive 25,000 to 45,000 miles a year...
I bought our Highlander 3 years ago (prices are different now I guess) & it's mid level, not the cheap one & not the expensive one. It took me about a week dealing with them but I paid $38,200. I thought that was a GREAT DEAL. What shocked me is that the other car dealers in town seemed to want to either rip you off or would out & out lie to you when the truth would have been better. The service department of our GM dealer, where we bought out last new car actually told me 2 outright lies that were easily disproved. Lie to me & I don't come back.Whether it's body on frame or unibody construction, it's still a damn nice vehicle and trusted for quality and reliability. If I had $50k lying around, I'd have one in my driveway...
It's a 2021. I think that I have almost 9,000 miles on it, that's why I don't care about gas mileage or for that matter the price of gas. If I had it all to do over again I would have happily paid more for it, I like it that much.@old tex what year is your Highlander? If my Tacoma is totalled, I'll be looking really hard at a 2019-2022 Highlander XLE. (I drive for 10-12 hours fairly often, and I really need seats with adjustable lumbar support. The XLE is the cheapest version that has that.)
We have a neighbor that bought a Highlander with about 275,000 ran and looked great, but he didn't check on Car Fax for the service records and ended up with the timing belt breaking. He pulled the engine and told me he was going to have it rebuilt, I told him that everything looked very good but he went ahead and had the engine rebuilt, he now has well over 300,000 miles on the Highlander. After he went through all this, I decided to check on our 2005 Sienna which has the same 3.3 liter engine as he has and I found no record of a timing belt change and we had over 176,000 miles on our van. We took the van into our local Toyota dealership and had them install a new water pump and timing belt, they told me that the belt was in need of replacing, we now have over 206,600 miles on the van, we are totally sold on the quality of Toyota's. By the way, newer Highlanders have a 3.5 liter engine with a timing chain. All I can say is, if the Toyota you're looking at has high mileage, have the dealer do a Car Fax check, if it's been well taken care of, I wouldn't be afraid of buying a high mileage Toyota, we bought a 2008 Tundra TRD that has around 203300+ miles on it and it starts, runs and shifts like a new vehicle, my wife doesn't care for the load dual exhaust but it fits my bucket list desire of wanting a V-8 powered vehicle before I die, although I kind of wanted a Mustang GT, however, looking at the price of them, the Tundra will do fine as it only cost us $10,000. If you think that's too much, I don't think so as good used Tundra's are hard to come by around here.I've researched, found information that suggests that the timing chain needs replacing between 80-100 thousand miles. Anyone else ever heard this
Enter your email address to join: