We had haggis whilst in Scotland and it was delicious!
Any thoughts on this? - https://recipes.howstuffworks.com/haggis.htm .. Specifically, relative to the 'why (according to Them) it's Banned in the US' part:
"...the authentic version has been banned from import in the U.S. since 1971. This is because the U.S. Department of Agriculture decreed that livestock lungs cannot be used as food for humans because they can contain stomach fluid, which is a serious foodborne illness risk.."
..WhaHuh?? I mean, I Get all this: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2010-title9-vol2/pdf/CFR-2010-title9-vol2-sec310-18.pdf ...relevant excerpt:
"§ 310.16 Disposition of lungs. (a) Livestock lungs shall not be saved for use as human food. (b) Lungs found to be affected with disease or pathology and lungs found to be adulterated with chemical or biological residue shall be condemned and identified as ‘‘U.S. Inspected and Condemned.’’ Condemned lungs may not be saved for pet food or other nonhuman food purposes. They shall be maintained under inspectional control and disposed of..." etc, etc, etc..
..Makes perfect sense, but... Lung, banned from import, "because... stomach fluid"??
a) I'd think any / all 'stomach fluids' would get either washed Out of the stomach 'bag' before repurposing, there, or b) Even if 'spongey' lungs Could absorb / get saturated (during slaughter, maybe? Even that seems a 'stretch'..) with those 'fluids', wouldn't any 'foodborne illness risk' be negated by Cooking?
I'm just not understanding the 'rationale' for that ban - based-on - the assertion that lungs might be full of "stomach fluids".. I think that's a stretch (and That specific verbiage isn't even in that section of the CFR, there.. "Lungs ..affected with disease or pathology... or chem / biological contam." - sure.. But "stomach fluids"?? No makey sense..
Any thoughts?
jd