I only disagree with you in that I don't equate feeding the poor as socialism.Our Founders did not invision our nation becoming a socialist welfare State. But over time that's exactly what we have become; a socialist welfare State.
Right now there are more job openings than people to fill them. And yet we still have millions of slackers sucking off the government tit. Even on this site I'm surprised at the number of people who support socialism. I have no problem with feeding those who truly need help. But not with tax payer money. There are countless charitable organizations that pass out food to the truly needy.
Why do so many people here support government theft from one person and giving it to someone else? Couldn't your family use that money more than some nameless loser in another part of the country? I know mine can. Socialists find it so easy to spend other people's money.
I don't think that food stamps are the answer, and I don't believe in the guarenteed income nonsense that will destroy what's left of Chicago.
We waste huge amounts of food in this country.
It seems like there should be a mechanism in place that could divert some of this waste and use it to feed the poor without hurting anyone financially.
From what I understand (and I could be wrong) prison systems evidentally give "nutriloaf" to the prisoners, which is, apparently, something like a ground-up mish-mash of different waste foods that are compacted into a nutritious loaf.
Keeping the poor from starving by making more efficient use of waste doesn't seem like it would impact anyone's pocketbook...or if it does, not as much as what we have now.