- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
- Messages
- 18,535
"Recon" is an abbreviation of reconnoiter or reconnaissance.
I think in the local usage where I've lived, its stream - creek - river. Streams aren't named on maps, creeks and rivers are. We have some creeks that would pass for rivers in some places.brook you step over, a creek you jump over, a stream you wade through, a river you ferry over.
America didn't "save" Britain in either wars, that's an American fallacy, certainly not in WW2, America didn't join the war until 1941 after Japan bombed Pearl Harbour by which time The Battle of Britain was all over, American certainly saved Europe with the help of Britain and quite a few other nations and nationalities (well it was a WORLD war).by the way the Russians lost more soldiers than the rest of "the allies" put together.
sorry, i'm a patriotic ENGLISHman and i'm proud of my country despite the rubbish politicians we have these days.
as for language I think it was Winston Churchill that said "2 countries DIVIDED by a common language"!!
aren't??How else can you contract "am not" ? "amn't"??? That is definitely not in the dictionary!
Ignorant grammar snobs just frost me.
So...aren't??How else can you contract "am not" ? "amn't"???
From Wikipedia:I don't think you can contract am not, aint is an American word, I have never heard an English person use such a term.
For most of its history, ain't was acceptable across many social and regional contexts. Throughout the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries, ain't and its predecessors were part of normal usage for both educated and uneducated English speakers, and was found in the correspondence and fiction of, among others, Jonathan Swift, Lord Byron, Henry Fielding, and George Eliot. For Victorian English novelists William Makepeace Thackeray and Anthony Trollope, the educated and upper classes in 19th century England could use ain't freely, but in familiar speech only. Ain't continued to be used without restraint by many upper middle class speakers in southern England into the beginning of the 20th century.
like I said, I personally have never met an English person who used this term in everyday conversation, I think it would be considered "slang" and only used by the uneducated .
‘Her name ain’t Nickleby,’ said the girl, ‘La Creevy, you mean.’aint is an American word
like I said, I personally have never met an English person who used this term in everyday conversation, I think it would be considered "slang" and only used by the uneducated .
We don't use the word dinner in my family, we use supper, someone asked me if I was coming to dinner once and I didn't know which meal they were talking about. We always use reckon too. It may be more regional. I met someone from New York and he said I sounded "country" what ever that is.Many parts of Northern U.S. had more "foreign" influence than the South. Germans, Dutch, Scandinavian, etc. We still retain some English words in the South that Yankees never use. "Reckon" for example.
There was a movement at one time to get Southerners to retain original British spellings like colour, etc. Because the spelling simplification was a "Yankee thing."
Also, there was once a large segment of middle to upper class Southerners who were non-rhotic and swallow their ng's ("Dahlin', what time ah we eatin' dinnuh?"). That is dying out.
There are no locally named streams or brooks here. Only creeks.I have only on map here that has brooks and creeks.
I think anymore creek just covers brooks and streams, to many people would get confused.
Enter your email address to join: