Klaus Schwab and the WEF (WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM)

Homesteading & Country Living Forum

Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
She admits she is left of center but not progressive. Even she was ostracized And eventually lost her job.

That's because she is gullible as all leftists are. She supported the misery of the left in the state it was in when she was indoctrinated.

She never imagined that "progressive" meant it would get worse.

This is why KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov said the people at the top of Communism's kill lists are the left. When these idiots finally see what Communism really is, they reject it. But they also know the crimes that were committed and by whom. They are also known to act in disruptive and traitorous ways.

Therefore, they have to go first. Executing them also sends a message to us sheep that Communism ain't fooling around.

So a leftist helps destroy society, and then becomes a demonstration of the evil of Communism.
 

“WEF Calls for Genetically Modifying Humans so They Become Allergic to Meat​


August 9, 2023


1691670697999.jpeg



The World Economic Forum has called for government’s to genetically modify citizens so that they become “allergic to consuming meat”, as part of a plan to fight global boiling.

According to newly resurfaced video footage, a WEF bioethicist called for human beings to be genetically engineered to become much smaller in size and completely meat-intolerant. Eating meat, under the WEF’s plans, would result in a person becoming violently ill or even dying.

“There’s this thing called the LONE STAR TICK where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. So that’s something we can do through human engineering. We can possibly address really big world problems through human engineering,” he added.


But Liao also wants to shrink humans through eugenics or hormone injections so they consume less resources.
 
They literally do not have this kind of technical knowledge.

These billionaires are common criminals. They collude and rob us at very high levels of government and financial management.

The twits they hire (the henchmen) will tell them whatever they want to hear.
 
They literally do not have this kind of technical knowledge.

Unfortunately, they do, and it is not anything high tech. Because we have lone star ticks at BOL2, I've already been looking into this. I've been bitten by lone star ticks but don't have a red meat allergy yet. With the lone star ticks, I can feel them crawling on my skin before they bite, so I've pulled a number of them off before they bit me. The insidious little buggers do not cause any pain when they bite you like the deer tick, so bites can go unnoticed.

The lone star tick can make you allergic to all mammalian meat (but not fish or poultry) and milk because of something called "alpha-gal syndrome." It's possible with other species of ticks to but not as common as with lone star ticks. In Australia it is caused by bites from the "paralysis tick (Ixodes holocyclus). Not everyone who is bitten by lone star ticks becomes allergic to red meat. I think the percentage is pretty low but I haven't found a specific number yet. And you have to be exposed to it multiple times before you develop an allergy, just like with other allergies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha-gal_syndrome
There is a sugar present in the blood and milk of non-primate mammals called galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal for short). Ticks that feed on non-primate mammals can have residual alpha-gal in their mouth, which then can be incidentally injected into humans when they feed on them.

Because this sugar is foreign to all primates, it can cause an allergic reaction once the person is sensitized to it. So all the WEF bastards have to do is put the sugar in all the vaccines and VIOLA! people start getting allergic to red meat en masse.

Fortunately, if you abstain from red meat and milk for a while, it's possible to recover from it.
 

“WEF Calls for Genetically Modifying Humans so They Become Allergic to Meat​


August 9, 2023


View attachment 20520


The World Economic Forum has called for government’s to genetically modify citizens so that they become “allergic to consuming meat”, as part of a plan to fight global boiling.

According to newly resurfaced video footage, a WEF bioethicist called for human beings to be genetically engineered to become much smaller in size and completely meat-intolerant. Eating meat, under the WEF’s plans, would result in a person becoming violently ill or even dying.

“There’s this thing called the LONE STAR TICK where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. So that’s something we can do through human engineering. We can possibly address really big world problems through human engineering,” he added.


But Liao also wants to shrink humans through eugenics or hormone injections so they consume less resources.

Unfortunately, they do, and it is not anything high tech. Because we have lone star ticks at BOL2, I've already been looking into this. I've been bitten by lone star ticks but don't have a red meat allergy yet. With the lone star ticks, I can feel them crawling on my skin before they bite, so I've pulled a number of them off before they bit me. The insidious little buggers do not cause any pain when they bite you like the deer tick, so bites can go unnoticed.

The lone star tick can make you allergic to all mammalian meat (but not fish or poultry) and milk because of something called "alpha-gal syndrome." It's possible with other species of ticks to but not as common as with lone star ticks. In Australia it is caused by bites from the "paralysis tick (Ixodes holocyclus). Not everyone who is bitten by lone star ticks becomes allergic to red meat. I think the percentage is pretty low but I haven't found a specific number yet. And you have to be exposed to it multiple times before you develop an allergy, just like with other allergies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha-gal_syndrome
There is a sugar present in the blood and milk of non-primate mammals called galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal for short). Ticks that feed on non-primate mammals can have residual alpha-gal in their mouth, which then can be incidentally injected into humans when they feed on them.

Because this sugar is foreign to all primates, it can cause an allergic reaction once the person is sensitized to it. So all the WEF bastards have to do is put the sugar in all the vaccines and VIOLA! people start getting allergic to red meat en masse.

Fortunately, if you abstain from red meat and milk for a while, it's possible to recover from it.
A few thoughts:

1. It's crazy how many lone star ticks we have seen this direction now. We never had them growing up.

2. I have been bit by them multiple times and haven't yet developed an allergy. And I'm allergic to all sorts of other stuff, so I find this interesting. I wonder if it's because I only eat red meat once a month or so on average.

3. Does every bite have the potential to cause this or is the alpha-gal only present some of the time?

I always just assumed it was due to a microbe like with Lyme, etc. I didn't realize it was from residual proteins from a previous bite. Thanks for sharing that.
 
2. I have been bit by them multiple times and haven't yet developed an allergy. And I'm allergic to all sorts of other stuff, so I find this interesting. I wonder if it's because I only eat red meat once a month or so on average.

3. Does every bite have the potential to cause this or is the alpha-gal only present some of the time?

I always just assumed it was due to a microbe like with Lyme, etc. I didn't realize it was from residual proteins from a previous bite.
I would imagine that the less red meat you eat, the less likely you will be to develop an allergy. I believe (but won't swear to it) that simply eating a lot of red meat and milk can cause an allergy through the same mechanism, even without being bitten. Exposure through the digestive system is not nearly as intense as exposure directly in the bloodstream however. So moderation in all things is always good. Eat chicken and fish sometimes.

A single bite will not cause the allergy. And not every bite will inject alpha-gal into your bloodstream. The tick has to have fed on a non-primate mammal, and I would guess that it had to be recently.

BTW, It's a sugar, not a protein.
 
I would imagine that the less red meat you eat, the less likely you will be to develop an allergy. I believe (but won't swear to it) that simply eating a lot of red meat and milk can cause an allergy through the same mechanism, even without being bitten. Exposure through the digestive system is not nearly as intense as exposure directly in the bloodstream however. So moderation in all things is always good. Eat chicken and fish sometimes.

A single bite will not cause the allergy. And not every bite will inject alpha-gal into your bloodstream. The tick has to have fed on a non-primate mammal, and I would guess that it had to be recently.

BTW, It's a sugar, not a protein.
Oh, sugar. You said that.

Thank you for the information! That is good to know. (Now let's hope I can actually remember it!)
 
Unfortunately, they do, and it is not anything high tech.

If this exists in nature already, that's one thing. My point was that they aren't able to just create whatever results they want from scratch.

Also, they do not take into account the very hard reality about life and its "will" to survive and succeed.
 
Government will artificially inflate numbers to make us believe that there's more of them than what they actually are. Example, mass shootings.
Communism is all about amplification.

They are a handful of strategically-placed individuals. They expect to capture the weak-minds of about 15% of the population. They expect another 35% to remain silent as "go along to get along". They then use their media power to make this 50% look like 90%.

Communism is all psy-op and various forms of bribery.
 
Communism is all about amplification.

They are a handful of strategically-placed individuals. They expect to capture the weak-minds of about 15% of the population. They expect another 35% to remain silent as "go along to get along". They then use their media power to make this 50% look like 90%.

Communism is all psy-op and various forms of bribery.
Only 35%?
I definitely saw more than 50% going along during covid.
 
They literally do not have this kind of technical knowledge.

These billionaires are common criminals. They collude and rob us at very high levels of government and financial management.

The twits they hire (the henchmen) will tell them whatever they want to hear.
I actually took this one step further in the name of research and read the paper he published in 2012 focused namely on using bioengineering to alter the size of humans. They do have the technology to stunt the growth of humans.
In the paper linked below he suggests ideas such as shrinking humans through the use of hormones, genetic manipulation and even reducing birth weights. Anything to keep larger humans from consuming too many resources and saving the planet.

He claims that one birth in the UK is responsible for 160 times more greenhouse gas emissions than one birth in Ethiopia. “With the right incentives, such as tax breaks, those others might be willing to have smaller children of their own.”
Among other things he also suggests that people be “allocated” a limit on how many children they are allowed to have, based on personal greenhouse gas emissions.

(paper is at the bottom of the article)
https://www.newswars.com/wef-linked...-modifying-humans-to-induce-meat-intolerance/
Towards the end, he admits the ideas are outrageous but that the situation is so dire, that all alternatives must be considered.
 

It never ceases to amaze me how these people come up with these ideas and start mandating implementation before the technology is there to support them. They assume that "the next generation of technology" will use less power and therefore their pie in the sky ideas need to be implemented now so it will be ready to run when the technology becomes available. Say what?

The computing power needed to run all this suggested monitoring...we would need to triple the current available electricity and that is without everyone plugging their vehicles in.
 
Government Land grab
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/ne...tp&cvid=0fa80a3cb91644d280ede40b543371b5&ei=7
"He (Hawaii governor Green) also added that state officials have appointed lawyers to visit the rescue shelters and response centers to provide free legal counsel to the natives. This is done to ensure that the natives are not exploited by outsiders who may try to make offers and grab their lands at unreasonable prices in the wake of the inferno."

Yeah, so the State can do it to them instead?
 
Last edited:
The global warming narrative is starting to change. Instead of trying to tell people we can save the planet by recycling, solar power, ev's etc, they are openly starting to shift the discussion to population reduction.

There have always been, as long as I can remember, those who have advocated for a reduction in population (Remember "The Mark of Gideon" episode in the original Star Trek", circa 1969?) The difference I am seeing now, is that their research is getting published in the MSM.

https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/32https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/4/3/32
Politicians are speaking of it and the sheeple are regurgitating it. The narrative is starting to change from changing how we live to having too many people living.

So right now, the discussion is, why we need fewer people but, no one is yet venturing into HOW to accomplish this. Most are simply suggesting that our "abuse" of the planet will result in some kind of naturally occurring mass die off.

However, given that these same people have been pushing the concept that if we do not contain global warming by 2030, we are all doomed...it is highly unlikely that once the concept of depopulation becomes mainstreamed (especially in the minds of Gen z and younger), that they will wait around for mother nature to do anything about it.

Anyone with an ounce of sense is starting to figure out that these "sustainable" solutions they have been proposing, actually consume more, albeit, different non-renewable resources, than the status quo. This, in addition to destroying quality of life via the economy...the elite could care less but, the minions are starting to wake up and realize, that their own lives are going to be of much lower quality so time to pivot.

To hasten the process and make their point more quickly, I think they are coming after farming and hamstringing production. Saying that it is for methane reduction and nitrate pollution, is just a convenient segue between narratives.

They have already fomented in the youth, blame of the Boomer generation for destroying the planet, jacking up housing prices so that young people cannot afford to purchase a home, making it so that you have to work hard to get ahead ect....weekly, I see at least one comment from a youngster, that boils down to "why don't you all just die already" and the on line media is doing what it can to cause further divisiveness with stories like "10 things Boomers did that Millennials can't do" or "8 things that millennials demand from their employers".

This will continue and get worse. Really when you think about it, and yes, this is heinous but, I'm going with their game here:

If you want to solve population problems, you don't get rid of those who cannot have children and have only a natural decade or two left in life. You do away with those who can reproduce and then just wait for the oldest to die off without replacement.

Anyway you cut it, expect to hear more and more of this kind of talk out in the open. It has started.
 
The end goal for most of the radical left wing ideology is, and has been for many decades, population reduction by any and all means necessary. Destruction of family, gay marriage, abortion, euthanasia, genital mutilation, carbon reduction, etc. etc. etc.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top