just in - getting close >>> MN National Guard activated - parking garages and mud filled parks reserved for troop billeting
Not looking to good in Minnesota,
- Thread starter BillMasen
- Start date
Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:
I read that the prosecutions key witness, the testimony of the medical coordinator was so effective for the defense during cross-examination, the defense has made it known they are planning on using the medical coordinator as their defense witness.
According to the official autopsy, Floyd did not die of asphyxiation but cardiac arrest as the cause of death. Hence the prosecution asked the jury to dismiss the autopsy.
Regardless, I would not want to be in that city.
Possibly any major city.
According to the official autopsy, Floyd did not die of asphyxiation but cardiac arrest as the cause of death. Hence the prosecution asked the jury to dismiss the autopsy.
Regardless, I would not want to be in that city.
Possibly any major city.
The defense lawyer keeps beating up these medical professionals making them comment on the lack of risks regarding the prone position after they already done established it wasn't the prone position Chauvin used. His knee was on his neck, not back/shoulder, but the defense is pounding into the heads of the jury the proper position is safe in hopes of making them forget the cop didn't even execute the restraint properly. These medical professionals should be responding "If the prone position had been used properly, yes, it would have been safer for Floyd... The state is dropping the ball big time. I lost count of all the missed objection opportunities as well. The prosecution is running out of steam.
The defense even made her comment on a hypothetical situation involving his death if the cops had not been involved. How ******* irrelevant is that?
Here's my WebMD diagnosis (note the sarcasm): I have done drugs and have witnessed overdoses. While the world contemplates how a lethal dose of fentanyl (the meth was miniscule) can allow him to complain about pain and discomfort, I'll be here listening to Pink Floyd's Comfortably Numb
The defense even made her comment on a hypothetical situation involving his death if the cops had not been involved. How ******* irrelevant is that?
Here's my WebMD diagnosis (note the sarcasm): I have done drugs and have witnessed overdoses. While the world contemplates how a lethal dose of fentanyl (the meth was miniscule) can allow him to complain about pain and discomfort, I'll be here listening to Pink Floyd's Comfortably Numb
Last edited:
Based off the few analysis I read, yesterday was the first good day (out of 9 days) the prosecution had.
The first two experts did pretty much what they were supposed to do. Although the prosecution giving the defense the charts and diagrams the one Dr. was going to use at 1700 the day before was kinda BS. But that is the kind of games lawyers play.
The third prosecution expert, apparently he has no expertise in forensics at all, i.e. not board certified in forensics, no degree, never employed to do forensics.
The first two experts did pretty much what they were supposed to do. Although the prosecution giving the defense the charts and diagrams the one Dr. was going to use at 1700 the day before was kinda BS. But that is the kind of games lawyers play.
The third prosecution expert, apparently he has no expertise in forensics at all, i.e. not board certified in forensics, no degree, never employed to do forensics.
Watching CNN. It looks to me like they are really trying to prime the pump for mass rioting and class warfare. In this "Trial by Media". They have already declared the prosecution the winner. There are 2 sides to every story. The defense has not even started yet. The testimony the prosecution's own doctor gave was that Floyd had heart disease with 2 arteries that nourish his heart, being partially closed off and one 90% closed. They also admitted that he had enough drugs in his system to kill him. All the defense has to do is create reasonable doubt in one juror. Then there will be massive rioting. I heard a black guy threaten to take the rioting out of the big cities and into the suburbs. CNN will sell many commercials.
All the reason more why not to watch CNN.
To add: Disturbing thought: The idea that CNN is trying to set the stage for rioting and class warfare.
With the Trump Slump leading to media layoffs, they need more news to report on. They would like nothing more than to fabricate a deadly situation to pump more views into their networks. These news outlets have successfully affixed steering wheels to the backs of nearly all Americans, left or right, and I guarantee they are not done trying to drive people around. With the authority of the federal government reaching beyond the aspects of interstate trade, their desire to influence people by the masses with propaganda and lies will never be successfully challenged. I patiently wait for Adam Kokesh to run for not-president.
Last edited:
could be going to jury by this next weekend - don't expect much of a defense - just go over that whole procedural correctness and stress that autopsy report ....
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2013
- Messages
- 18,291
Whatever happens in the outcome of the trial, the ghetto class will burn and loot like they always do. The media will encourage them, make excuses for their animal behavior and blame the White man, like they always do. But the world is a better place without this drug addicted criminal in it.
if the DNC sanctioned looting & rioting continues >>> it's hard to tell just what will be happening - I half expect Biden to get involved and open his puppet mouth to excuse anything including outrite attacks on whites ....
expect the unexpected >>> wouldn't discount a left turn into a white subdivision or town - the BLM & ANTIFA tried this in their protesting BS in various parts of the country - once the genie comes popping out, it'll be hard to find the cork, much less stopper it back up ....
Last edited:
latest looting & violence pics from the Twin Cities >>>>
r/ActualPublicFreakouts - Looting in Minneapolis 4-11-2021
r/ActualPublicFreakouts - Looting in Minneapolis 4-11-2021
Why bother following the trial? You all know what is going to happen. Minneapolis residents need to pay their fire insurance premiums up to date and increase coverage if possible.
CNN has already declared the prosecution the winner. If by some terrible perversion of justice according to CNN the defense makes their point anyone who feels oppressed is fully justified in murdering white people or burning and looting their possessions.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2013
- Messages
- 18,291
The ghetto apes are already doing what they always do; burn and loot. Every one of these animals should be shot.
https://jonathanturley.org/2021/04/...politics-over-process-in-the-wright-shooting/
I have read elsewhere, but want to see more reporting/evidence before providing a link, that allegedly antifa has arrived in Minneapolis.
I have read elsewhere, but want to see more reporting/evidence before providing a link, that allegedly antifa has arrived in Minneapolis.
Get your popcorn ready....
Would LOVE to see a blood TOX screen on him, Prop caused the heart attack!!!
Bring in the National Guard, authorize them to use deadly force, and STOP this crap!!!
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/...cked-while-covering-minnesota-police-protests
I watched the video earlier, tried just now, but I get a "This page is not available to you," message on Twitter, where I did not get that message and watched the vid before.
Someone noted that CNN did not cover their own story on the Don Lemon show.
I watched the video earlier, tried just now, but I get a "This page is not available to you," message on Twitter, where I did not get that message and watched the vid before.
Someone noted that CNN did not cover their own story on the Don Lemon show.
hit by water bottle - you mean a chunk of ice the size of a water bottle >>>> they disguise their projectiles as water bottles - protest sign sticks are sharpened spears - umbrellas are shields and battering rams .....
if ANTIFA is there with one of their supply trucks getting ready for some heavy upsurges in violence ....
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2013
- Messages
- 18,291
I saw a lot of White face trash in the crowds on the "news". What a bunch of ignorant Leftist losers. Don't any of these people have jobs? Or are they all on welfare. What a great system we have.
No they don't have jobs. That would get in the way of the time they need to spend looting.
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2017
- Messages
- 23,655
Alot of them consider being there their job. They get paid for it.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,449
Revealed: Former AG Barr blocked Derek Chauvin plea deal that would have given 10 year sentence
Posted by: Gregory Hoyt|February 11, 2021 |CategoriesFeatured, Investigations
Revealed: Former AG Barr blocked Derek Chauvin plea deal that would have given 10 year sentence
MINNEAPOLIS, MN – Some interesting new details have come to light regarding the case against former police officer Derek Chauvin, as there was once reportedly a plea deal offered to him days after the death of George Floyd.
And apparently, former AG Bill Barr was the person to have stopped the plea bargain from going through.
Here’s the details on this latest development.
By now, most everyone is familiar with the case lodged against Chauvin as he has been charged in connection with the in-custody death of Floyd from back in May of 2020. Currently, Chauvin is facing charges of second-degree unintentional murder and second-degree manslaughter.
Yet, just days after the death of Floyd, there was reportedly a plea bargain offered to Chauvin for third-degree murder – which Chauvin was reportedly willing to agree to.
Said plea bargain would have seen Chauvin serve a decade or more behind bars for the death of Floyd, which officials were in the process to rally up the press and announce that Chauvin had agreed to plead guilty.
But in order for the deal to go through, it would’ve had to have gotten the greenlight from then-AG Bill Barr, which Barr at the time said to pull the deal.
The reason Barr needed to approve the deal was that said deal would’ve seen Chauvin serve his sentence in federal prison.
The reported rationale for Barr’s decision was multifaceted, according to reports, with Barr at the time expressing concerns that a plea deal for third-degree murder would seem too lenient and that the investigation into the incident was far too early to begin entertaining potential plea bargains.
Furthermore, Barr was also said to have noted that the case was about to fall into the hands of state prosecutors who he felt would be best suited how to handle the case moving forward.
More at Link
Posted by: Gregory Hoyt|February 11, 2021 |CategoriesFeatured, Investigations
Revealed: Former AG Barr blocked Derek Chauvin plea deal that would have given 10 year sentence
MINNEAPOLIS, MN – Some interesting new details have come to light regarding the case against former police officer Derek Chauvin, as there was once reportedly a plea deal offered to him days after the death of George Floyd.
And apparently, former AG Bill Barr was the person to have stopped the plea bargain from going through.
Here’s the details on this latest development.
By now, most everyone is familiar with the case lodged against Chauvin as he has been charged in connection with the in-custody death of Floyd from back in May of 2020. Currently, Chauvin is facing charges of second-degree unintentional murder and second-degree manslaughter.
Yet, just days after the death of Floyd, there was reportedly a plea bargain offered to Chauvin for third-degree murder – which Chauvin was reportedly willing to agree to.
Said plea bargain would have seen Chauvin serve a decade or more behind bars for the death of Floyd, which officials were in the process to rally up the press and announce that Chauvin had agreed to plead guilty.
But in order for the deal to go through, it would’ve had to have gotten the greenlight from then-AG Bill Barr, which Barr at the time said to pull the deal.
The reason Barr needed to approve the deal was that said deal would’ve seen Chauvin serve his sentence in federal prison.
The reported rationale for Barr’s decision was multifaceted, according to reports, with Barr at the time expressing concerns that a plea deal for third-degree murder would seem too lenient and that the investigation into the incident was far too early to begin entertaining potential plea bargains.
Furthermore, Barr was also said to have noted that the case was about to fall into the hands of state prosecutors who he felt would be best suited how to handle the case moving forward.
More at Link
https://justthenews.com/government/security/violent-consequences-defunding-police
Not really much of a surprise, but interesting to see.
Not really much of a surprise, but interesting to see.
