I prefer to believe what is said by scientists and naturalists than some guy who says he dosent believe it.
I found a map many years ago that showed a rise in water levels, I forget how high i'll have to dig it out my files again.
the point I was making about The Somerset Levels before was that on this map the water inundated the area and Glastonbury Tor would again be one of the "Seven islands" it was before the Romans and then the monks drained it.
I suppose on an island the size of Britain it will have more of an impact, than the continent of the US, so we tend to take more notice of it.
BP, there are scientists on both sides of this debate.
I'm not looking for a map of water 'levels', I'm looking for a documented prediction of how much sea levels will rise and when.
Here is an example. Exactly 10 years and 2 days ago, Al Gore stunned a German audience by telling them that in a short 5 years (2013), the North Pole would be completely melted. He told them that
“the entire North ‘polarized’ cap will disappear in 5 years." That wasn't a water level prediction, but it was a solid prediction with a very measurable expectation. So we look back at the prediction, we look at the facts today, and I don't think anyone can argue that his prediction was 100% wrong. Not a 5% error, not 1%, not 10%: his prediction has 0% correlation, IOW a 100% margin of error. Here's a link:
https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2013/12/14/yet-another-final-countdown-expires/
So can you quote some study or report with specific predictions that are measurable in time and result? By 'time and result', again, look at Gore's statement. He said 5 years (time) and he said 'cap will disappear' (result).
Or even better, can you find a prediction from 5+ years ago that we can evaluate today? I've given an example above with Al Gore showing how wrong they are. Can you point at one that has actually been correct?
