Don't need anything beside some onion
That will be supper one night this week with fried potatoes.
Man, you are killing me. Everything looks so good.
Ummm, can you explain your lesson plan? You have them in trees over the water to teach them how to snorkel? I learned by being in the water itself.Several years later same kid plus another grandkid in a tree hanging over water at campground in the Keys, we were teaching them how to use snorkles
Ummm, can you explain your lesson plan? You have them in trees over the water to teach them how to snorkel? I learned by being in the water itself.
Meer - are you applying some kind of soft-focus/light-blending effect to the photos you are posting? Maybe taking a picture-of-a-picture in a photo album through a sheet of plastic? I'm just wondering, because they are coming through with barely enough detail to make out the larger elements in the pictures, and small details are totally lost.
Good eating there.
Not easily. A scanner might work a little better, but who wants to buy one of those just to post a few pictures on the internet? Plus, a scanned image is never as good as the original. For example, below is a scan of a picture-book photo, I just did on my medium-low range scanner. With some minor enhancements done post-scan to adjust contrast, brightness, sharpness, etc. You can see that even this is not that great of an image. Scanning an actual high quality photograph would be better than this book image (book images are quite low resolution), but it still serves as a good example of what you could expect. IMHO, it's really not that much better than your picture-of-a-picture to justify going the extra cost and extra effort of using a scanner. If you were entering a photo contest? Yes. But posting snapshots on the forum? No, not in my opinion. Not unless there were details in the photo you were posting that you really wanted people to see.You got it ,I'm taking a picture of older pictures. Any other way to do it?
Enter your email address to join: