That is interesting.........And it actually says a "LOT". My other thought is, maybe instead of living in the Alaska wilderness.......I might be "safer" hiding in a bookstore.
I am struggling a little not to get on my soap box about this. I truly truly do not want to offend anyone, especially people like Alaskajohn or Sourdough who have contributed so much and taught me so many things. That said though, the combination of advanced prepper and South African in me is struggling not to point out the faults in articles such as this.
It should not be taken away that for beginner preppers or just encouraging someone to start prepping this article has great value. But it is riddled with incorrect statements.
For example: (and yes I'm gonna get picky but if the author wants to put things on the internet like this at least get things right)
"The state of KwaZulu Natal is in a true Without-Rule-Of-Law situation"
First of all KZN is a province not a state. Second if this is how westerners see a WROL situation than there needs to be some re evaluation as to your understanding of the term. I looked it up and this is what I got: WROL stands for Without Rule of Law, doomsday prepper lingo for the complete breakdown of governance after a major environmental or other disaster. There was never a complete break down of governance in KZN or GP for that matter. Further more that article was written today, 3 days ago KZN was much closer to, or at WROL, than it is today. There were always still police on the streets trying their best. There are SANDF personal on the streets today. There are private security companies on the streets. I am not disputing that it was and still is dangerous, chaotic, damaging and on and on. But at no point did the government completely withdraw or collapse.
Another one:
Lesson: In a WROL situation, a badge and a uniform mean NOTHING. Do not rely on outward appearances. If you find yourself in a true WROL situation, understand that police may not be police. Don’t let them in by virtue of the uniform alone.
This is to me an obvious one, in a WROL situation or a normal every day situation. Of course the police may not be police. Two examples why. Just north of Durban there was a serial rapist nicknamed the Blue Light Rapist. Why? Because he did his car up, got a uniform, pulled female drivers over.. and you get the picture.
Second, Nova Scotia, Canada. The worst mass shooting in Canadian history happened here. The guy dressed up as a cop, did his car up like a police cruiser and proceeded to ruin and take many many lives.
I could go on through the article but I think I have probably annoyed everyone quite enough.
"The state of KwaZulu Natal is in a true Without-Rule-Of-Law situation"
First of all KZN is a province not a state.
I saw it on youtube, it looked like BLM riot, but persons not a part of the riot used guns to stop the riot from move their way. So it was different then here in USA.
I'm not trying to jump on anybody here, but there as usual in the media, is just so much incorrect information. And if he meant state of the situation he should word things better. Things are quiet bad enough without authors and reporters either making things up or purposely twisting information.Rebecca.........I believe the author of the article was using the word "State" as a reference to a "time" period and/or a "condition" that exists with-in that time period. And not referencing a political boundary.
In other words........the "current environmental conditions" in KwaZulu Natal.....
I realize this is "Painful" for you for many reasons. And I am sorry for your having to endure this.
I am really grateful for your concern.I realize this is "Painful" for you for many reasons. And I am sorry for your having to endure this.
Enter your email address to join: