I like the phrase "I'm pan-trib. It will all pan out in the end."
Seems the mid term rapture is a relatively new doctrine when compared to the doctrinal history of the church. The articles of faith did confirm a strong conviction that if it was good enough for our Lord and the early church to suffer death and persecution then it be good enough for us to die for the faith too., Where as the church was seen as the continuation of the spiritual Israel of God which included believers from the 4 corners of the world. Now with the new beliefs of Nelson Darby from the 19th century England which were rather revolutionary and perhaps heretical he put the Jewish ones entirely above and outside the standard realm of Christian salvation classifying them as serving God in one of his many dispensation periods of prophecy. My bible only teaches one universal body the body of Christ the Israel of God and not two. Peachy Bruce Gore seminary teaching ( the age of Dispensationalismin in America ) might be some help. You find on U tube. Maybe these books may be of some interest as well. Our bible says if anyone comes with a different gospel other than the gospel of Christ even if he a angel let him be accursed.Not so sweetie. Many of us in here very much believe in God and his Word. As for the rapture? I’m torn as when it will happen. God has not given me a clear answer on when it will happen.
That be good we not. We not want any rapturous ones going AOL thinking they are flying off to heaven when they be merely hiding under their bed : ) All be required with ammo and gun fully loadedI am here on this earth at God’s discretion. If being here thru the Tribulation is his wish, I will gladly do his will!
Haha I don't think any peppers are going to be hiding under their beds regardless of their interpretation.That be good we not. We not want any rapturous ones going AOL thinking they are flying off to heaven when they be merely hiding under their bed : ) All be required with ammo and gun fully loaded
--- Here is information for those that prepare for the worst .
It is just my personal guess , but I don't think they will Nuke us into oblivion even though they likely could . Like all wars fought since the dawn of mankind , the victors want to reap the spoils of war . As much as most despise the leadership in the United States Capitol , I don't expect them to destroy it , not out of some code of war but because they want to leave the idiot in charge in a position that he can surrender the country . Much of the country would be destroyed to bring on the surrender but they especially want the fertile land for agriculture . -- This theory applies to other countries as well .So, what do you think this means as far as war with them? Do you expect they'd nuke us into an oblivion or try to salvage the land?
Name any country that is not corrupt? They are all corrupt to one degree or another.
When Crockett was later asked why he invoked the Constitution in that manner, and what led him to speak so clearly and forcefully against appropriating such a seemingly small amount, he told of an earlier, somewhat similar event."Mr. Speaker — I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the suffering of the living, if suffering there be, as any man in this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living.
"I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to so appropriate a dollar of the public money.
"Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the grounds that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death, and I have never heard that the government was in arrears to him. This government can owe no debts but for services rendered, and at a stipulated price. If it is a debt, how much is it? Has it been audited, and the amount due ascertained? If it is a debt, this is not the place to present it for payment, or to have its merits examined. If it is a debt, we owe more than we can ever hope to pay, for we owe the widow of every soldier who fought in the War of 1812 precisely the same amount.
"There is a woman in my neighborhood, the widow of as gallant a man as ever shouldered a musket. He fell in battle. She is as good in every respect as this lady, and is as poor. She is earning her daily bread by her daily labor; and if I were to introduce a bill to appropriate five or ten thousand dollars for her benefit, I should be laughed at, and my bill would not get five votes in this House. There are thousands of widows in the country just such as the one I have spoken of, but we never hear of any of these large debts to them.
"Sir, this is no debt. The government did not owe it to the deceased when he was alive; it could not contract it after he died. I do not wish to be rude, but I must be plain. Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot, without the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as a charity.
"Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week's pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks."
Every American citizen has a moral and spiritual obligation to see that no neighbor, no person, child or adult, suffers for the lack of necessities while he has the slightest surplus in his own name. But neither does man have the right to use government and the law, in the name of charity, to force the unwilling to do that which he would not do if the choice were his."The power of collecting and disbursing money at pleasure is the most dangerous power that can be trusted to man, particularly under our system of collecting revenue which reaches every man in the country, no matter how poor he may be, and the poorer he is the more he pays in proportion to his means. What is worse, it presses upon him without his knowledge where the weight centers, for there is not a man in the United States who can ever guess how much he pays to the government.
"While you are contributing to relieve one, you are drawing from thousands who are even worse off than he. If you had the right to give anything, the amount was simply a matter of discretion with you, and you had as much right to give $20 million as $20,000. If you have the right to give to one, you have the right to give to all; and, as the Constitution neither defines charity nor stipulates the amount, you are at liberty to give to any and everything which you may believe, or profess to believe, is a charity, and in any amount you may think proper. You will very easily perceive what a wide door this would open for fraud and corruption and favoritism, on the one hand, and for robbing the people on the other.
"No, Colonel, Congress has no right to give charity. Individual members may give as much of their own money as they please, but they have no right to touch a dollar of the public money for that purpose. If twice as many houses had been burned in the country as in Georgetown, neither you nor any other member of Congress would have thought of appropriating a dollar for our relief. There are about two hundred and forty members of Congress. If they had shown their sympathy for the sufferers by contributing each one week's pay, it would have made over $13,000. There are plenty of wealthy men around Washington who could have given $20,000 without depriving themselves of even a luxury of life. The congressmen chose to keep their own money, which, if reports be true, some of them spend not very creditably; and the people about Washington, no doubt, applauded you for relieving them from necessity of giving what was not yours to give.
"The people have delegated to Congress, by the Constitution, the power to do certain things. To do these, it is authorized to collect and pay moneys, and for nothing else. Everything beyond this is usurpation, and a violation of the Constitution. So you see, Colonel, you have violated the Constitution in what I consider a vital point. It is a precedent fraught with danger to the country, for when Congress once begins to stretch its power beyond the limits of the Constitution, there is no limit to it, and no security for the people. I have no doubt you acted honestly, but that does not make it any better, except as far as you are personally concerned, and you see that I cannot vote for you."
BOMBSHELL FROM RUSSIA
Ukrainian document released to Russian media outlet, @izvestia, showing decree from Zelensky to destroy all files on Ukrainian defense service members, employees and staff of the state, and any involvement with Hunter Biden’s biolab METABIOTA, on 02/24/22, the same day the air strikes on Ukraine began.
See original document above on the left and then translated in English on the right. Holy **** is this a doozy. But wait, there’s a lot more.
Remember that infamous video of Ukrainian MIL burning documents RIGHT IN FRONT of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense building in Kyiv, Ukraine? On 02/24/22 THE SAME DAY OF THE DECREE FROM ZELENSKY.
Advertisement - story continues below
Yup. The MSM broadcasted a video of Ukrainian MIL destroying evidence of Ukrainian State involvement with HUNTER BIDEN’S BIOLAB in Ukraine, right as Russia was beginning its missile strikes.
You guys… we caught them all. We caught them in broad daylight on MSM. Check it out.
They think he will quit. The man is crazy he will go down swinging.Putin seems to be making it clear he won’t fight the normal way…with tanks and such against NATO.
View attachment 18820
View attachment 18821
Enter your email address to join: