Voter fraud and the 2020 election

[DrHenley]

Watch it while you can. They violated the new YouTube censorship rules every which way from Sunday.
I think it will be uploaded to Rumble later.

 

[user 6493]

 

[DrHenley]

Wait... I thought you didn't believe in God.

 

[user 6493]

Wait... I thought you didn't believe in God.

this is for those of you that do,,,,,,,,,,,,it is good advice no matter who put them on paper,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,you could use a little wisdom

 

[Illini Warrior]

I still say the only cheating in this election was the media bashing trump every chance they got. The lawsuits will be dismissed shortly and life will go on.

almost half of SCOTUS have been personally azz reamed by jerks like you >>> they wouldn't miss this opportunity to do a royal return job that you'll NEVER FORGET ....

 

[TexasFreedom]

View attachment 11632

this is for those of you that do,,,,,,,,,,,,it is good advice no matter who put them on paper,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,you could use a little wisdom

Hang on. I thought the last line was something like... "and the wisdom to hide the bodies where they will never be found." ??? I can't seem to find this verse in the Bible anywhere.... ( humor folks...)

 

[Oddcaliber]

Its from Alcoholics Anonymous. Prayer is done at every meeting.

 

[user 6493]

Its from Alcoholics Anonymous. Prayer is done at every meeting.

not really

Reinhold Niebuhr
Theologian


Description
Description
Karl Paul Reinhold Niebuhr was an American Reformed theologian, ethicist, commentator on politics and public affairs, and professor at Union Theological Seminary for more than 30 years. Wikipedia
Born: June 21, 1892, Wright City, MO
Died: June 1, 1971, Stockbridge, MA
Children: Elisabeth Sifton
Education: Eden Theological Seminary (Interfaith Partnership), Yale Divinity School, Elmhurst University, Yale University

 

[Maverick]

Texas failed at the SCOTUS

 

[Proud Prepper]

Texas failed at the SCOTUS

No they didn't

 

[user 6493]

Texas failed at the SCOTUS

I was sure it would,this is the biggest conspiracy in US History

 

[Oddcaliber]

What's the real deal?

 

[user 6493]

What's the real deal?

it's been kicked out

 

[user 6493]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/s...lenging-bidens-victory/ar-BB1bRm9c?li=BBnb7Kz

 

[user 6493]

now I am done here some of you will continue to bitch and post anything you see on this that leans the way you want,,,,hate it like or don't care,,,,it is time to move on


now go ahead bash me cry some more whatever makes you feel better,,,,

like anything else this will pass,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,goodnight

 

[user 7704]

Last week we weren't relying on Texas. So it's back to where it was

 

[M0del_31]

Looks like it won't matter if the deep state packs the court and does away with the electoral college. Texas can start printing 2024 straight party ballots now, no signature, no address and no identity. The republican nominee can win the popular vote in 2024 with a 9.2 trillion vote margin and no other state will have any standing to contest it.

 

[Proud Prepper]

There's indisputable evidence of election changing voter fraud. We will not allow it to continue.

 

[Brent S]

Well, I just the Supreme Court tossed the big one. Can we go back to talking about prepping now?

 

[Brent S]

almost half of SCOTUS have been personally azz reamed by jerks like you >>> they wouldn't miss this opportunity to do a royal return job that you'll NEVER FORGET ....

And you really think you can call me a jerk.....

 

[TexasFreedom]

I wonder what SCOTUS is thinking? Not the 3 wacko liberals and the blackmailed scumbag Roberts. But I mean the other 3 of the 5 real conservatives? This ruling is clearly Pontius Pilate washing his hands of innocent blood. Is it so important for them to keep their hands clean while the blood of the nation gushes out?

To argue that Texas (and half the States in our nation) does not have a horse in this race is to say that the voice of half our nation doesn't matter. If nothing else, hear the case. SCOTUS might learn a few things. But no, they stuck their noses up in the air and said "let them eat cake".

Maybe they think another case will have more merit? I don't know what's going on in their heads. But I wonder if their clean washed hands can cover their eyes when blood splashes across the nation.

 

[LindaSue]

I wonder what SCOTUS is thinking? Not the 3 wacko liberals and the blackmailed scumbag Roberts. But I mean the other 3 of the 5 real conservatives? This ruling is clearly Pontius Pilate washing his hands of innocent blood. Is it so important for them to keep their hands clean while the blood of the nation gushes out?

To argue that Texas (and half the States in our nation) does not have a horse in this race is to say that the voice of half our nation doesn't matter. If nothing else, hear the case. SCOTUS might learn a few things. But no, they stuck their noses up in the air and said "let them eat cake".

Maybe they think another case will have more merit? I don't know what's going on in their heads. But I wonder if their clean washed hands can cover their eyes when blood splashes across the nation.

I don’t know what the SCOTUS is thinking, but this nation is headed in a pretty scary direction regardless if States try to secede or if there is another Civil War. There’s nothing good on the horizon. Christ have mercy on us all.

 

[user 7704]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...rce=Parler&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

 

[Proud Prepper]

I wonder what SCOTUS is thinking? Not the 3 wacko liberals and the blackmailed scumbag Roberts. But I mean the other 3 of the 5 real conservatives? This ruling is clearly Pontius Pilate washing his hands of innocent blood. Is it so important for them to keep their hands clean while the blood of the nation gushes out?

To argue that Texas (and half the States in our nation) does not have a horse in this race is to say that the voice of half our nation doesn't matter. If nothing else, hear the case. SCOTUS might learn a few things. But no, they stuck their noses up in the air and said "let them eat cake".

Maybe they think another case will have more merit? I don't know what's going on in their heads. But I wonder if their clean washed hands can cover their eyes when blood splashes across the nation.

It could be more 3D chess. The rumor mill says SCOTUS has secretly ruled in favor of the Trumps Pennsylvania suite. They are buying time to prepare for civil unrest before announcing verdict.

 

[Amish Heart]

Really? I thought we were just waiting for Monday
What can they do to prepare for civil unrest?

 

[Dani]

Sure looks like justices just **** on the Constitution. Trump’s Legal Team Considering Alternate Options After Supreme Court Rejects Texas Election Suit December 11, 2020 Attorneys on President Donald Trump’s legal team, Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, shared on Friday that the team is considering filing separate lawsuits to district courts in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s rejection of a lawsuit from Texas to challenge the 2020 election results in four battleground states. The two attorneys also called for courage from the courts to allow hearings on the lawsuits. Justices on the nation’s highest court late Friday denied the Lone Star state’s request to sue Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. They opined that Texas lacked legal standing—or capability—to sue under the Constitution because it has not shown a valid interest to intervene in how other states handle their elections. In an interview with Newsmax, Giuliani called the court’s decision a “terrible terrible mistake.” “Basically the courts are saying they want to stay out of this, they don’t want to give us a hearing, they don’t want the American people to hear the facts,” the former New York City mayor said. “These facts will remain an open sore in our history unless they get resolved. They need to be heard they need to be aired and somebody needs to make a decision on whether they’re true or false. And some courts are going to have to have the courage to make that decision.” “The case wasn’t rejected on the merits the case was rejected on standing,” Giuliani said. “The answer to that is to bring the case now to the district court by the president by some of electors alleging the same facts where there would be standing and therefore get a hearing.” “There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court, in which the president would have standing,” he continued. “Some of the electors would have standing in that their constitutional rights have been violated.” Trump's Legal Team Considering Alternate Options After Supreme Court Rejects Texas Election Suit?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-11-6

 

[Dani]

RUDY GIULIANI: ‘We’re Not Finished, Believe Me’



"If we allow them to roll over this election fraud, it's just going to get worse and worse," said Giuliani.



Attorney Rudy Giuliani said the Supreme Court made a “terrible, terrible mistake” by refusing to hear the Texas election fraud lawsuit tonight on Newsmax, adding that evidence of widespread voter fraud “will remain an open sore in our history” if left unaddressed.



Giuliani noted that the Supreme Court decision “wasn’t rejected the on merits, the case was rejected on standing.”



“So, the answer to that is to bring the case now in the District Court, by the President, by some of the electors, alleging the same facts, where there would be standing, and therefore, get a hearing.”



Because the worst part of this is, basically, the courts are saying they want to stay out of this and they don’t want to give us a hearing. They don’t want the American people to hear these facts, and I think that’s a terrible, terrible mistake,” said Giuliani.



'WE'RE NOT FINISHED…BELIEVE ME': America's Mayor Rudy Giuliani reacts to the Supreme Court throwing out the lawsuit Texas presented. https://t.co/VlT7z8v2lm pic.twitter.com/FRvRTH8NeP



— Newsmax (@newsmax) December 12, 2020



Following the Supreme Court decision, Giuliani made it clear that he believes that President Donald Trump still has legal paths to victory.



“Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward announced on Friday that they have just submitted their case to the Supreme Court regarding alleged election fraud in their own state. Crucially, this would not run into the same issue as the Texas lawsuit, which was only initially struck down based on a technicality. The decision did not rule on any of the actual facts at hand, and further lawsuits based within one state would still apply.



The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday took up a case from President Trump’s legal team, which seeks to have hundreds of thousands of ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties thrown out. “During the recount in Dane and Milwaukee counties, we know with absolute certainty illegal ballots have unduly influenced the state’s election result,” said Jim Troupis, counsel to the Trump campaign.



State legislatures can also still take control of their Electoral College votes if they so choose, as the Constitutional power to do so still remains with them.”



“We’re not finished, believe me,” said Giuliani.



The Trump Legal Team plans to continue their legal efforts to fight for election integrity in the states of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, by using arguments based on a dissent from the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the 2000 Bush v. Gore case, in which she said the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is on January 6, when t

 

[Dani]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_a...t-to-restore-election-integrity_3610513.html/

 

[Dani]

At least we got this.
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously You May Sue Government Agents for Damages

U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously You May Sue Government Agents for Damages When They Violate Your Individual Rights - Institute for Justice

 

[Dani]

Sidney Powell tweet

Pay attention! We made emergency filings in #SupremeCourt tonight for #Georgia & #Michigan. Will be filing #Arizona #Wisconsin shortly. These cases raise constitutional issues and prove massive #fraud.

Our plaintiffs have #standing

#WeThePeople will not allow #rigged elections