Voter fraud and the 2020 election
- Thread starter user 7704
- Start date
Help Support Homesteading & Country Living Forum:
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,449
The Fight for Our Freedom Continues Despite SCOTUS Ruling on Texas
In a shock to all who value justice, the Supreme Court turned down the Texas 2020 election case:
SCOTUS claims Texas did not demonstrate a judicially recognizable interest in the manner!
So individuals can take over the election process in certain predetermined states, enough to steal the Presidency or the House and that’s ok? There’s no impact on the rest of the country? A man who’s made billions on other countries at the expense of American citizens can steal an election using every possible opportunity to manufacture votes and steal votes from his opponent and it has no impact on average hard working tax paying American?
No one in their right mind believes Biden won this election and most Americans believe he stole it!
Tonight they’re drinking champagne in China.
(But the ruling by the court was based on the jurisdiction and not the merits so there may be some hope.)
WHAT NOW? The Fight for Our Freedom Continues Despite SCOTUS Ruling on Texas
In a shock to all who value justice, the Supreme Court turned down the Texas 2020 election case:
SCOTUS claims Texas did not demonstrate a judicially recognizable interest in the manner!
So individuals can take over the election process in certain predetermined states, enough to steal the Presidency or the House and that’s ok? There’s no impact on the rest of the country? A man who’s made billions on other countries at the expense of American citizens can steal an election using every possible opportunity to manufacture votes and steal votes from his opponent and it has no impact on average hard working tax paying American?
No one in their right mind believes Biden won this election and most Americans believe he stole it!
Tonight they’re drinking champagne in China.
(But the ruling by the court was based on the jurisdiction and not the merits so there may be some hope.)
WHAT NOW? The Fight for Our Freedom Continues Despite SCOTUS Ruling on Texas
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,449
Rita Hart Aims to Overthrow Iowans' Vote in 2nd Congressional Race
Former Democrat Iowa State Senator Rita Hart has defended her plan to appeal the results of Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District race, which she lost by very few votes to Republican Mariannette Miller-Meeks.
“When we know there were a lot of votes that were not examined it’s just so crucial that we get this right and we make sure every person’s vote was counted,” Hart said.
According to Hart, she is challenging the results in the U.S. House of Representatives instead of Iowa courts because “there was only one way that we could get the result that we need, and that is to take this to the Committee on House Administration.”
Once filed, Hart’s challenge will be reviewed by the House administrative committee in Washington, DC.
Miller-Meeks took to social media to share the clip of Hart’s message on election challenges, saying the “only way she can win” is if Democrats, which have the majority in the House, overturn the election.
“My opponent said it herself: She knows the only way she can win is if the Democrat controlled U.S. House overturns the election result,” Miller-Meeks wrote in a tweet.
“That is why she is ignoring the will of Iowa voters and asking Nancy Pelosi to elect her,” Miller-Meeks added.
Calvin Moore, the communications director for American Action Network, a nonprofit, conservative issue advocacy group based in Washington, DC, described Hart’s actions as a “shameful power grab.”
“At least Rita Hart is finally coming clean with the truth: there is ‘only one way’ she can win and that’s if Nancy Pelosi overrides voters to give her the seat,” Moore said. “This is a shameful power grab at its worst and lawmakers ought to reject her ploy outright.”
With more than 400,000 votes cast and an official recount certified by state officials, it was confirmed that Hart was defeated by Miller-Meeks by six votes.
NOTHING TO SEE HERE!
Former Democrat Iowa State Senator Rita Hart has defended her plan to appeal the results of Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District race, which she lost by very few votes to Republican Mariannette Miller-Meeks.
“When we know there were a lot of votes that were not examined it’s just so crucial that we get this right and we make sure every person’s vote was counted,” Hart said.
According to Hart, she is challenging the results in the U.S. House of Representatives instead of Iowa courts because “there was only one way that we could get the result that we need, and that is to take this to the Committee on House Administration.”
Once filed, Hart’s challenge will be reviewed by the House administrative committee in Washington, DC.
Miller-Meeks took to social media to share the clip of Hart’s message on election challenges, saying the “only way she can win” is if Democrats, which have the majority in the House, overturn the election.
“My opponent said it herself: She knows the only way she can win is if the Democrat controlled U.S. House overturns the election result,” Miller-Meeks wrote in a tweet.
“That is why she is ignoring the will of Iowa voters and asking Nancy Pelosi to elect her,” Miller-Meeks added.
Calvin Moore, the communications director for American Action Network, a nonprofit, conservative issue advocacy group based in Washington, DC, described Hart’s actions as a “shameful power grab.”
“At least Rita Hart is finally coming clean with the truth: there is ‘only one way’ she can win and that’s if Nancy Pelosi overrides voters to give her the seat,” Moore said. “This is a shameful power grab at its worst and lawmakers ought to reject her ploy outright.”
With more than 400,000 votes cast and an official recount certified by state officials, it was confirmed that Hart was defeated by Miller-Meeks by six votes.
NOTHING TO SEE HERE!
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,449
| After Kevin McCarthy Joined 125 House Republicans In Supporting Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit, Dems Want To Use Civil War Law About Traitors To Ban Them From Being Seated In Congress After Kevin McCarthy Joined 125 House Republicans In Supporting Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit, Dems Want To Use Civil War Law About Traitors To Ban Them From Being Seated In Congress – Right Journalism |
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,449
Ron
@CodeMonkeyZ
Unfortunately we seem to be teetering ever precariously towards path #2.
https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/133757264459862835
@CodeMonkeyZ
Unfortunately we seem to be teetering ever precariously towards path #2.
https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/133757264459862835
Well, if we don't have a horse in this race, and it seems the SCOTUS is of that opinion, why don't we just load that filly into the trailer and LEAVE!!!!... join the TNM!
This is what Trump must do! He has standing and even more than that...he took an OATH to Protect US from enemies foreign and domestic! Right now we have both attacking and TAKING OVER our country via threats, lies, and outright theft of our election system. He must stop them!
After Kevin McCarthy Joined 125 House Republicans In Supporting Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit, Dems Want To Use Civil War Law About Traitors To Ban Them From Being Seated In Congress
After Kevin McCarthy Joined 125 House Republicans In Supporting Texas Supreme Court Lawsuit, Dems Want To Use Civil War Law About Traitors To Ban Them From Being Seated In Congress – Right Journalism
Typical evil Dems. Call the Republicans for doing what they ARE doing! Seems to work many times. Not this time!
There is no easy way now to fix the theft of our Nation and freedoms without fighting for it. Fight or get on your knees to await whatever demands and force will be put upon you.
Looks like I need to get very busy finding land in Texas!
I just read that 4 times in the past a democratic candidate won the popular vote but the republican candidate won the electoral vote. None of them whined as much as trump has...
Clinton, Gore, Cleveland and Tilden all lost with the electoral votes, but should have won due to the majority of votes. Trump did not win either the popular vote nor the electoral.
Use your angst for something more productive, like helping your party in the next elections. Beating a dead horse isn’t doing anyone any good. And it’s cost many millions in our taxpayer dollars.
Clinton, Gore, Cleveland and Tilden all lost with the electoral votes, but should have won due to the majority of votes. Trump did not win either the popular vote nor the electoral.
Use your angst for something more productive, like helping your party in the next elections. Beating a dead horse isn’t doing anyone any good. And it’s cost many millions in our taxpayer dollars.
There isn't going to be another fair election Brent. The globalists got away with this one and that is now the formula. The voting machine software will forever be rigged. Stalin said it best ... it doesn't matter how the people vote, it only matters who is counting the votes.
The globalists control the media and we heard Russia for 4 years and Biden (the Big Guy) and China? ....crickets. On top of that they will throw open the borders to get another needy class in here they can buy with welfare as it seems a significant portion of the blacks were leaving the plantation.
What really gets me is the Democrats, who saw an evil rich guy behind every bush 3 decades ago, now have no problem marrying up with the richest people in the entire planet. Amazing!
The globalists control the media and we heard Russia for 4 years and Biden (the Big Guy) and China? ....crickets. On top of that they will throw open the borders to get another needy class in here they can buy with welfare as it seems a significant portion of the blacks were leaving the plantation.
What really gets me is the Democrats, who saw an evil rich guy behind every bush 3 decades ago, now have no problem marrying up with the richest people in the entire planet. Amazing!
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,004
It
Will be harder than they think to pack the Court. FDR couldn't do it and the loves him. Manchin has already said its a no vote from him.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,004
HAVE FAITH!! BIG NEWS COMING 
Sidney Powell
Sidney Powell
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,004
Serious question...... Where were you guys mentally in 2000 and the whole hanging Chad thing going on? Had you given up hope and conceded to Gore? I would really like to know. I never gave up and always thought Bush would win and it took long and had no where near the forensics of this case.
Not even for a second. And I will not give up on UTTERLY DESTROYING those responsible for the corruption of our election system. China must go down, hard for this! As do every politician and judge!
I think this is what Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell are referring to as yet open paths for Trump to have the election overturned: HOW TRUMP CAN WIN: SCOTUS, State Supreme Courts, Legislatures, And The 12th Amendment
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,004
QUOTE="M0del_31, post: 209622, member: 6645"]
Bush or Gore, we had already lost. They were both swamp creatures back then too.
[/QUOT
That's not the point of the question.
Bush or Gore, we had already lost. They were both swamp creatures back then too.
[/QUOT
That's not the point of the question.
I’m pretty sure it’s only been about 12 hours since you said you were ready to start talking about prepping. What happened to that?
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,004
Brent, this is about out and out theft not popular vs electoral votes. Totally different.
LOL... when they are the minority political viewpoint like back in the 60s....it was all about protecting those minority views. Now they have a slight majority (questionable) and it's THE MOB RULES!!!
Robin, why do you bother? Liberals never care about pesky laws or the Constitution. It's their way, period.
Considering that every court in the land says otherwise, as does any real evidence, I have to say your wrong. I’m not talking out of passion or my dislike of trump here. Purely a factual look at every thing with the election.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 10,004
Why is everyone right and left calling it Trump's attempt to overturn the election results? There are no official results yet.
Those saying that KNOW, like anyone with a few working braincells, that there was fraud by China, Dems and even bought out Repubs! They do it to make it “seem” like the theft didn’t happen. It did!
Good point Robin. A more accurate statement would be to say that Trump is trying to BRING legitimacy to the election counts.
Even Alan Dershowitz...a long term Dem said the SCOTUS was wrong.
“Appearing on Newsmax TV’s ''Stinchfield,'' Dershowitz agreed with Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who indicated that Texas did have standing, saying they ''get the better of the argument,'' but that the court just didn’t want to deal with what may be perceived as political.“
He is one of the few Dems I have any respect for!
“Appearing on Newsmax TV’s ''Stinchfield,'' Dershowitz agreed with Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who indicated that Texas did have standing, saying they ''get the better of the argument,'' but that the court just didn’t want to deal with what may be perceived as political.“
He is one of the few Dems I have any respect for!
