I don't think so! But there are SO MANY who live in such places!Should people get a bailout when they put themselves in harms way?
Many live on the river. Floods happen where I live and the rivers wipe out the old mill towns. Then everyone talks about rebuilding.southern appalachians are a long way from coast..but yet they got pounded to death the other day.
I tend to agree but if your land is taken by the powers that be, you should be well compensated.I don't believe anyone should be responsible to bail anyone out who loses their property for any reason.
Isn't that what insurance is for? I pay a lot. Had my first claim in 40 years of home ownership this year when a tree crushed my building. My premiums over the year are still more than what I had in damage.I don't believe anyone should be responsible to bail anyone out who loses their property for any reason.
Insurance is different than the taxpayer being forced to pay for someone else's property.Isn't that what insurance is for? I pay a lot. Had my first claim in 40 years of home ownership this year when a tree crushed my building. My premiums over the year are still more than what I had in damage.
As for coastal or other places that get water damage, I could be persuaded to agree to an insurance 1 TIME payout. After that, you're on your own.
Absolutely. Only its "fairly" compensated.I tend to agree but if your land is taken by the powers that be, you should be well compensated.
Enter your email address to join: