He can't charge for a meeting that never happens. If you have decided not to fight, then I wouldn't go.
Well, either you're in or you're out. You have to decide one way or the other b/c if you don't, you're just going to get more drama. Cut the cord OR fight.....but you have to choose. Playing down the middle will do you absolutely NO good. If you're out, then you've gotta ignore and stop caring about what happens to any of it and let the chips fall where they lie.
Is this a meeting or a hearing? Find out what it's about. Is it for a settlement? Have you spoken with your last lawyer to tell her what is going on and that you can't afford to pay her, but was wondering if perhaps you could work something out as far as a % of what you will ultimately be entitled to? If nothing else, perhaps she can advise whether or not you should attend the hearing/meeting. It's worth a call. If you're going to fight, then you need a lawyer. If your previous lawyer cares at all, then perpahs she can give you some advise on what to do next and give you an idea on how this will proably shake out.
Personally, I wouldn't give 2
what their lawyer wants!
If you and your sis can't get on the same page, then the other sisters will probably win.
Delay what? If you both refuse to go to the hearings, won't they have to just continue on to Probate anyways?
Many institutions demand a beneficiary to be listed b/c they don't want to deal with the mess that not having one listed brings with it. I can't blame them for that.
I think it's odd that 2 people were appointed as executors. I've never heard of that before. It seems like it would be a jumbled mess having 2 executors instead of just 1.