Voter fraud and the 2020 election

[DrHenley]

https://apple.news/ADbhCYI57QPe1OeWb82nwXQi understand that everyone here is upset their guy didn’t win but the Supreme Court even says there was no fraud.

They said no such thing.

 

[Illini Warrior]

https://apple.news/ADbhCYI57QPe1OeWb82nwXQi understand that everyone here is upset their guy didn’t win but the Supreme Court even says there was no fraud.

and we all thought the Fake News just blew crap out their azz - that lawsuit had NOTHING to do what-so-ever with the OBVIOUS ELECTION FRAUD ......

 

[Illini Warrior]

Appears SCOTUS would like to hear from Texas instead.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

probably a bigger bite into the DNC hind quarter - a FED Constitutional issue vs just an individual state ....

SCOTUS just might have back channeled what they wanted to chew on ....

 

[Proud Prepper]

https://apple.news/ADbhCYI57QPe1OeWb82nwXQi understand that everyone here is upset their guy didn’t win but the Supreme Court even says there was no fraud.

Thats just idiotic!

 

[user 7704]

So the vote was 6-3 to hear the case
Maybe Roberts wont be an ass this time.

 

[user 7704]

Good question

 

[Oddcaliber]

Something tells me that's not egg roll in there.

 

[TexasFreedom]

So the vote was 6-3 to hear the case
Maybe Roberts wont be an ### this time.

I'd take that bet. Roberts is a total sell-out. He has a 'job'. Bring in the case, argue against Texas, try to sway/bribe/mislead one of the other conservatives to vote against it. Just wait. The left 'owns' him. Treat him like a case of Ebola.

 

[TexasFreedom]

Wow, you can't make this up.

A republican won a race in NY by 12 votes. One dozen. Today 12 votes were magically 'found' in a drawer. A few days ago 60-some votes were found in another 'drawer', of which several were from unregistered voters. The cheating is so blatant... and show such incompetence!

 

[GaRp58]

 

[Dani]

Swalwell, who sits on the House Intel Committee, and is privy to America’s most closely held secrets, is 100% compromised. He did everything in his power to destroy the lives of anyone who worked for

@realDonaldTrump

over the past 4yrs with lies, lies, lies—as China owns his ass!



i appreciate the heads up

 

[Dani]

The year before he knowingly peddled false allegations about Russia collusion against
@RealDonaldTrump
, coup cabal member Rep. Swalwell was warned by FBI about his association with a suspected Chinese communist agent, who raised money for him and placed an intern in his office.

 

[Dani]

BIG NEWS FOR ALL WHISTLE BLOWERS DURING THE ELECTION AND PAST AND FUTURE !!

House passes Sens. Grassley and Leahy's bipartisan whistleblower protection legislation

House passes Sens. Grassley and Leahy's bipartisan whistleblower protection legislation

Sens. Grassley and Leahy both urged the president to sign the legislation into law.

Sen. Charles Grassley and Sen. Patrick Leahy in 2017

the House of Representatives on Tuesday approved bipartisan legislation by Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont that aims to protect whistleblowers who sound the alarm about breaches of antitrust law.



The Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act was approved by the Senate in 2019 and will now head to the president. In statements included in a press release Sens. Grassley and Leahy both urged the president to sign the legislation into law.



“The Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act encourages and shields from reprisal private sector employees to shine a light on activities that violate our antitrust laws," Grassley said in the statement. "This bipartisan bill is an important step to safeguarding fair marketplaces as well as the whistleblowers who support them. It’s earned broad support in both chambers of Congress, and I urge President Trump to sign it into law without delay.

One more Republican and five more Democrats are described as "Additional original cosponsors" of the legislation: Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).



"The Criminal Antitrust Anti-Retaliation Act extends whistleblower protections for employees who provide information to the Department of Justice related to criminal antitrust violations. The Senate unanimously passed a similar version of the legislation in 2013, 2015 and 2017," the press release noted. "The bill allows an employee who believes he or she is the victim of retaliation to file a complaint with the Secretary of Labor, and provides for that employee to be reinstated to their former status if the Secretary finds in their favor. Grassley and Leahy authored similar whistleblower statutes as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002"

 

[Dani]

Kash Patel, new chief of staff to Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller, returns to DC early from Asia trip with Miller. Pentagon won’t say why he was called back abruptly.

 

[Dani]

David Shafer



The Georgia Senate Republican Caucus has issued a lengthy statement calling for absentee ballot signature audits, a GBI investigation and more Senate hearings. They vow to repeal @GaSecofState

’s compromise settlement agreement with the Democrats on absentee ballot signatures.







GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger



We believe the General Assembly should reform absentee ballot laws. However the legislators in 2005 voted for no excuse, no photo ID for absentee ballots. David Shafer voted for it and did nothing to reform this law, even when he was Senate President Pro Tempore.

 

[GeorgiaPeachie]

Good question

China clearly has Georgia State government in their pockets. Makes me sick to be a resident here! There will be a backlash like you’ve never seen after President Trump takes out these Treasonous POS!

All decent and moral Georgians are outraged and are talking recall efforts. Don’t think it will be necessary as I see Kemp and Raffensperger going to prison.

 

[GeorgiaPeachie]

Let us all say prayers today and tomorrow for the SCOTUS to settle this horrendous Fraud being pushed by evil actors inside and outside our country.

 

[DrHenley]

The only thing the Supreme Court did with the Pennsylvania case was respond to Application (20A98) for emergency injunctive relief. The case was not thrown out.
Here is the case:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html

 

[Illini Warrior]

as of this AM another 8 states have joined the Texas SCOTUS filed suit >>> should be double that today with over 20+ individual states eventually >>> not sure if the GOP governors can enact an emergency power to override any DNC AGs actively involved & trying to continue the election fraud .....

 

[Oddcaliber]

Would be nice if all the red states joined in the fight.

 

[user 7704]

TN has joined suit. Up to 10 states now. Yay, yay. Strength in numbers.

 

[Proud Prepper]

The only thing the Supreme Court did with the Pennsylvania case was respond to Application (20A98) for emergency injunctive relief. The case was not thrown out.
Here is the case:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html

True, its just crazy that they didn't think it was important enough for an emergency hearing.

 

[DrHenley]

True, its just crazy that they didn't think it was important enough for an emergency hearing.

No, what they denied was emergency injunctive relief. Look at the case. They accepted amicus briefs after denying the emergency injunctive relief. They may be of the opinion (as many Constitution scholars are) that the Dec. 8th "Safe Harbor" doesn't apply to this case, so it wasn't necessary to take action without having time for evidence to be presented in an orderly fashion. I believe they are making DAMNED sure all the "i"s are dotted and all the "t"s are crossed.

And they also may have believed that there was no way to get all the necessary testimony (on both sides) and cross examinations in quick enough due to the enormous volume of evidence. Remember, they can't act on what they have read in CNN or Breitbart, and there is simply not enough time in a day to sift through thousands of affidavits. The evidence has to be presented to them in court.

The Texas case is much cleaner because the facts aren't disputed, only the Constitutionality of the actions of those states. That can be heard and acted on PDQ in comparison to the Pennsylvania case. Pretty damned straightforward - the Constitution says the electors are to be chosen in a manner to be determined by the State Legislature, not the Governor, not the Attorney General, not the Secretary of State, and not the State Supreme Court.

 

[The Parahunter]

Either way, Trump lost PA and the Supreme Court won't even consider hearing about it. The same will happen to the TX case. The highest court in the land won't even consider cases of "voter fraud" by the Trump administration or by TX. What does that tell you?

No, what they denied was emergency injunctive relief. Look at the case. They accepted amicus briefs after denying the emergency injunctive relief. They may be of the opinion (as many Constitution scholars are) that the Dec. 8th "Safe Harbor" doesn't apply to this case, so it wasn't necessary to take action without having time for evidence to be presented in an orderly fashion. I believe they are making DAMNED sure all the "i"s are dotted and all the "t"s are crossed.

And they also may have believed that there was no way to get all the necessary testimony (on both sides) and cross examinations in quick enough due to the enormous volume of evidence. Remember, they can't act on what they have read in CNN or Breitbart, and there is simply not enough time in a day to sift through thousands of affidavits. The evidence has to be presented to them in court.

The Texas case is much cleaner because the facts aren't disputed, only the Constitutionality of the actions of those states. That can be heard and acted on PDQ in comparison to the Pennsylvania case. Pretty damned straightforward - the Constitution says the electors are to be chosen in a manner to be determined by the State Legislature, not the Governor, not the Attorney General, not the Secretary of State, and not the State Supreme Court.

 

[Illini Warrior]

True, its just crazy that they didn't think it was important enough for an emergency hearing.

they don't want to piecemeal this election fraud >>> been looking for something like this TX filed case

 

[user 7704]

TX AG just said he didn't know of any states that had joined suit. At 8:39 a.m.

 

[DrHenley]

Either way, Trump lost PA and the Supreme Court won't even consider hearing about it. The same will happen to the TX case. The highest court in the land won't even consider cases of "voter fraud" by the Trump administration or by TX. What does that tell you?

Your source of that information? Certainly not THE SUPREME COURT because they say both cases are still open.

Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et al., Applicants v. Pennsylvania, et al.
Texas, Plaintiff v. Pennsylvania, et al.

 

[DrHenley]

Some magical Biden vote humor

https://rumble.com/vayfsx-biden-votes-keep-appearing.html

 

[OldButtoni]

And now that they have the actual machines to forensically audit, we can see the real mechanics of how the criminal transmission of election data to Frankfurt accomplished the fraud: Modems in Dominion Voting Systems manufactured by communist Chinese corporation

 

[OldButtoni]

Looks like the FBI is finally beginning to do its job in this matter, albeit a little late, don'tcha think? EXCLUSIVE: FBI Criminal Probe Tracks 500,000 Counterfeit Biden Ballots in Four Key Battleground States – True Pundit